Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?

Three frequently used response formats are compared via analysis of covariance structures. The cumulative results based on four data sets provided evidence inconsistent with previous research suggesting that these formats are interchangeable. The semantic-differential format is most preferred while...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	OFIR, Chezy, REDDY, Karempudi Srinivas, BECHTEL, Gordon G.
Format:	text
Language:	English
Published:	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1987
Subjects:	Analysis of Covariance Factor Analysis Hypothesis Testing Mathematical Models Psychometrics Rating Scales Scaling Semantic Differential Statistical Studies Test Reliability Test Validity Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Online Access:	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3014 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2201_2
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	Singapore Management University
Language:	English

id	sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4013
record_format	dspace
spelling	sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-40132016-03-26T06:56:52Z Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent? OFIR, Chezy REDDY, Karempudi Srinivas BECHTEL, Gordon G. Three frequently used response formats are compared via analysis of covariance structures. The cumulative results based on four data sets provided evidence inconsistent with previous research suggesting that these formats are interchangeable. The semantic-differential format is most preferred while in most cases the Stapel format is least preferred. 1987-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3014 info:doi/10.1207/s15327906mbr2201_2 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2201_2 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Analysis of Covariance Factor Analysis Hypothesis Testing Mathematical Models Psychometrics Rating Scales Scaling Semantic Differential Statistical Studies Test Reliability Test Validity Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
institution	Singapore Management University
building	SMU Libraries
continent	Asia
country	Singapore Singapore
content_provider	SMU Libraries
collection	InK@SMU
language	English
topic	Analysis of Covariance Factor Analysis Hypothesis Testing Mathematical Models Psychometrics Rating Scales Scaling Semantic Differential Statistical Studies Test Reliability Test Validity Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
spellingShingle	Analysis of Covariance Factor Analysis Hypothesis Testing Mathematical Models Psychometrics Rating Scales Scaling Semantic Differential Statistical Studies Test Reliability Test Validity Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods OFIR, Chezy REDDY, Karempudi Srinivas BECHTEL, Gordon G. Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?
description	Three frequently used response formats are compared via analysis of covariance structures. The cumulative results based on four data sets provided evidence inconsistent with previous research suggesting that these formats are interchangeable. The semantic-differential format is most preferred while in most cases the Stapel format is least preferred.
format	text
author	OFIR, Chezy REDDY, Karempudi Srinivas BECHTEL, Gordon G.
author_facet	OFIR, Chezy REDDY, Karempudi Srinivas BECHTEL, Gordon G.
author_sort	OFIR, Chezy
title	Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?
title_short	Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?
title_full	Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?
title_fullStr	Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?
title_full_unstemmed	Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?
title_sort	are semantic response scales equivalent?
publisher	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate	1987
url	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3014 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2201_2
_version_	1770570836964540416

Are Semantic Response Scales Equivalent?

Similar Items