Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China
The premise of much research on dyadic trust building within organizations has been framed around the relationship as it emerges in the work context. Such models, including the seminal Mayer et al. (1995) model of dyadic trust, have been applied to contexts outside North America without a careful un...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3675 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4674/viewcontent/Trust_Turkey_China_2010_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4674 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-46742021-09-07T00:46:24Z Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China Wasti, S. Arzu Tan, Hwee Hoon The premise of much research on dyadic trust building within organizations has been framed around the relationship as it emerges in the work context. Such models, including the seminal Mayer et al. (1995) model of dyadic trust, have been applied to contexts outside North America without a careful understanding of the distribution of social practices and everyday situations in such contexts. This chapter examines culture-specific workways as a starting point for understanding subordinates’ trust in their supervisors in collectivist cultures. Workways refer to the pattern of workplace beliefs, mental models and practices about what is true, good and efficient within the domain of work. Drawing from interviews with sixty organizational respondents from two countries, Turkey and China, we propose that the multiplexity of work relations needs to be taken into account as both personal and professional life domains are important for understanding supervisor–subordinate trust in collectivist cultures. 2010-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3675 info:doi/10.1017/CBO9780511763106.013 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4674/viewcontent/Trust_Turkey_China_2010_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Trust collectivist cultures work relations Turkey China Multicultural Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Trust collectivist cultures work relations Turkey China Multicultural Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
Trust collectivist cultures work relations Turkey China Multicultural Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory Wasti, S. Arzu Tan, Hwee Hoon Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China |
description |
The premise of much research on dyadic trust building within organizations has been framed around the relationship as it emerges in the work context. Such models, including the seminal Mayer et al. (1995) model of dyadic trust, have been applied to contexts outside North America without a careful understanding of the distribution of social practices and everyday situations in such contexts. This chapter examines culture-specific workways as a starting point for understanding subordinates’ trust in their supervisors in collectivist cultures. Workways refer to the pattern of workplace beliefs, mental models and practices about what is true, good and efficient within the domain of work. Drawing from interviews with sixty organizational respondents from two countries, Turkey and China, we propose that the multiplexity of work relations needs to be taken into account as both personal and professional life domains are important for understanding supervisor–subordinate trust in collectivist cultures. |
format |
text |
author |
Wasti, S. Arzu Tan, Hwee Hoon |
author_facet |
Wasti, S. Arzu Tan, Hwee Hoon |
author_sort |
Wasti, S. Arzu |
title |
Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China |
title_short |
Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China |
title_full |
Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China |
title_fullStr |
Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antecedents of Supervisor Trust in Collectivist Cultures: Evidence from Turkey and China |
title_sort |
antecedents of supervisor trust in collectivist cultures: evidence from turkey and china |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3675 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4674/viewcontent/Trust_Turkey_China_2010_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1770571752570617856 |