Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services

To examine what, if any, are the differences in how activities are coordinated within versus between firms, we conducted interviews with 32 project managers regarding 60 projects in the offshore software services industry. Uniquely, our projects were sampled along two dimensions: (1) colocation vers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SRIKANTH, Kannan, PURANAM, Phanish
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4683
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5682/viewcontent/FirmCoordinatingSystem_orsc_2013_afv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5682
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-56822017-06-13T03:17:23Z Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services SRIKANTH, Kannan PURANAM, Phanish To examine what, if any, are the differences in how activities are coordinated within versus between firms, we conducted interviews with 32 project managers regarding 60 projects in the offshore software services industry. Uniquely, our projects were sampled along two dimensions: (1) colocation versus spatial distribution and (2) delivery by groups of individuals from a single firm versus from multiple firms. Our evidence suggests that in colocated projects, the same broad categories of coordination mechanisms are used both within and between firms. However, there is a qualitative difference in how geographically (i.e., spatially) distributed projects are coordinated within versus between firms. Distributed projects conducted within firms rely extensively on tacit coordination mechanisms; such mechanisms are not readily available in between-firm projects that are spatially distributed. This difference may arise because of the lack of shared history and lack of enforcement through common authority in the between-firm context. 2014-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4683 info:doi/10.1287/orsc.2013.0886 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5682/viewcontent/FirmCoordinatingSystem_orsc_2013_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University coordination common ground firm boundaries knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm distributed work offshoring offshore outsourcing tacit coordination mechanisms Business Strategic Management Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic coordination
common ground
firm boundaries
knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm
distributed work
offshoring
offshore outsourcing
tacit coordination mechanisms
Business
Strategic Management Policy
spellingShingle coordination
common ground
firm boundaries
knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm
distributed work
offshoring
offshore outsourcing
tacit coordination mechanisms
Business
Strategic Management Policy
SRIKANTH, Kannan
PURANAM, Phanish
Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services
description To examine what, if any, are the differences in how activities are coordinated within versus between firms, we conducted interviews with 32 project managers regarding 60 projects in the offshore software services industry. Uniquely, our projects were sampled along two dimensions: (1) colocation versus spatial distribution and (2) delivery by groups of individuals from a single firm versus from multiple firms. Our evidence suggests that in colocated projects, the same broad categories of coordination mechanisms are used both within and between firms. However, there is a qualitative difference in how geographically (i.e., spatially) distributed projects are coordinated within versus between firms. Distributed projects conducted within firms rely extensively on tacit coordination mechanisms; such mechanisms are not readily available in between-firm projects that are spatially distributed. This difference may arise because of the lack of shared history and lack of enforcement through common authority in the between-firm context.
format text
author SRIKANTH, Kannan
PURANAM, Phanish
author_facet SRIKANTH, Kannan
PURANAM, Phanish
author_sort SRIKANTH, Kannan
title Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services
title_short Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services
title_full Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services
title_fullStr Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services
title_full_unstemmed Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Offshore Software Services
title_sort firm as a coordination system: evidence from offshore software services
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2014
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4683
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5682/viewcontent/FirmCoordinatingSystem_orsc_2013_afv.pdf
_version_ 1770572402311299072