Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard

This article provides an answer to the question of why agents make self-serving decisions under moral hazard and how their self-serving decisions can be kept in check through institutional arrangements. Our theoretical model predicts that the agents' power and the manner in which they are held...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: PITESA, Marko, THAU, Stefan
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4953
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5952/viewcontent/pitesa_thau_JAP_2013_afv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5952
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-59522017-05-23T02:35:17Z Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard PITESA, Marko THAU, Stefan This article provides an answer to the question of why agents make self-serving decisions under moral hazard and how their self-serving decisions can be kept in check through institutional arrangements. Our theoretical model predicts that the agents' power and the manner in which they are held accountable jointly determine their propensity to make self-serving decisions. We test our theory in the context of financial investment decisions made under moral hazard using others' funds. Across 3 studies, using different decision-making tasks, different manipulations of power and accountability, and different samples, we show that agents' power makes them more likely to behave in a self-serving manner under moral hazard, but only when the appropriate accountability mechanisms are not in place. Specifically, we distinguish between outcome and procedural accountability and show that holding agents accountable for their decision-making procedure reduces the level of self-serving decisions under moral hazard and also curbs the negative consequences of power. Implications for decisions under moral hazard, the psychology of power, and the accountability literature are discussed. 2013-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4953 info:doi/10.1037/a0031697 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5952/viewcontent/pitesa_thau_JAP_2013_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University moral hazard accountability power investment decisions unethical behavior Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic moral hazard
accountability
power
investment decisions
unethical behavior
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle moral hazard
accountability
power
investment decisions
unethical behavior
Organizational Behavior and Theory
PITESA, Marko
THAU, Stefan
Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard
description This article provides an answer to the question of why agents make self-serving decisions under moral hazard and how their self-serving decisions can be kept in check through institutional arrangements. Our theoretical model predicts that the agents' power and the manner in which they are held accountable jointly determine their propensity to make self-serving decisions. We test our theory in the context of financial investment decisions made under moral hazard using others' funds. Across 3 studies, using different decision-making tasks, different manipulations of power and accountability, and different samples, we show that agents' power makes them more likely to behave in a self-serving manner under moral hazard, but only when the appropriate accountability mechanisms are not in place. Specifically, we distinguish between outcome and procedural accountability and show that holding agents accountable for their decision-making procedure reduces the level of self-serving decisions under moral hazard and also curbs the negative consequences of power. Implications for decisions under moral hazard, the psychology of power, and the accountability literature are discussed.
format text
author PITESA, Marko
THAU, Stefan
author_facet PITESA, Marko
THAU, Stefan
author_sort PITESA, Marko
title Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard
title_short Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard
title_full Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard
title_fullStr Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard
title_full_unstemmed Masters of the Universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard
title_sort masters of the universe: how power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2013
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4953
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5952/viewcontent/pitesa_thau_JAP_2013_afv.pdf
_version_ 1770573006066679808