Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior

Two assumptions guide the current research. First, people's desire to see themselves as moral disposes them to make attributions that enhance or protect their moral self-image: When approached with a prosocial request, people are inclined to attribute their own noncompliance to external factors...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIN, Stephanie C., ZLATEV, Julian J., MILLER, Dale T.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5259
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6258/viewcontent/MoralTraps_2017.pdf
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6258/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0022103116305236_mmc1.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6258
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-62582019-09-18T08:09:15Z Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior LIN, Stephanie C. ZLATEV, Julian J. MILLER, Dale T. Two assumptions guide the current research. First, people's desire to see themselves as moral disposes them to make attributions that enhance or protect their moral self-image: When approached with a prosocial request, people are inclined to attribute their own noncompliance to external factors, while attributing their own compliance to internal factors. Second, these attributions can backfire when put to a material test. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that people who attribute their refusal of a prosocial request to an external factor (e.g., having an appointment), but then have that excuse removed, are more likely to engage in prosocial behavior than those who were never given an excuse to begin with. Study 3 shows that people view it as more morally reprehensible to no longer honor the acceptance of a prosocial request if an accompanying external incentive is removed than to refuse a request unaccompanied by an external incentive. Study 4 extends this finding and suggests that people who attribute the derision to behave prosocially to an internal factor despite the presence of an external incentive are more likely to continue to behave prosocially once the external incentive is removed than are those for whom no external incentive was ever offered. This research contributes to an understanding of the dynamics underlying the perpetuation of moral self-regard and suggests interventions to increase prosocial behavior. 2017-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5259 info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.004 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6258/viewcontent/MoralTraps_2017.pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6258/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0022103116305236_mmc1.pdf Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Morality Attributions Decision making Prosocial behavior Marketing Social Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Morality
Attributions
Decision making
Prosocial behavior
Marketing
Social Psychology
spellingShingle Morality
Attributions
Decision making
Prosocial behavior
Marketing
Social Psychology
LIN, Stephanie C.
ZLATEV, Julian J.
MILLER, Dale T.
Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
description Two assumptions guide the current research. First, people's desire to see themselves as moral disposes them to make attributions that enhance or protect their moral self-image: When approached with a prosocial request, people are inclined to attribute their own noncompliance to external factors, while attributing their own compliance to internal factors. Second, these attributions can backfire when put to a material test. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that people who attribute their refusal of a prosocial request to an external factor (e.g., having an appointment), but then have that excuse removed, are more likely to engage in prosocial behavior than those who were never given an excuse to begin with. Study 3 shows that people view it as more morally reprehensible to no longer honor the acceptance of a prosocial request if an accompanying external incentive is removed than to refuse a request unaccompanied by an external incentive. Study 4 extends this finding and suggests that people who attribute the derision to behave prosocially to an internal factor despite the presence of an external incentive are more likely to continue to behave prosocially once the external incentive is removed than are those for whom no external incentive was ever offered. This research contributes to an understanding of the dynamics underlying the perpetuation of moral self-regard and suggests interventions to increase prosocial behavior.
format text
author LIN, Stephanie C.
ZLATEV, Julian J.
MILLER, Dale T.
author_facet LIN, Stephanie C.
ZLATEV, Julian J.
MILLER, Dale T.
author_sort LIN, Stephanie C.
title Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
title_short Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
title_full Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
title_fullStr Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
title_full_unstemmed Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
title_sort moral traps: when self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5259
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6258/viewcontent/MoralTraps_2017.pdf
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6258/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0022103116305236_mmc1.pdf
_version_ 1770573661526294528