A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity

Insight into assessors’ initial impressions has the potential to advance knowledge on how assessors form dimension-based judgments and on possible biases in these ratings. Therefore, this study draws on dual process theory to build and test a model that integrates assessors’ dimension ratings (i.e.,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: INGOLD, Pia V., DONNI, Mirjam, Filip LIEVENS
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5932
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6931/viewcontent/Pia__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6931
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-69312019-05-22T12:51:53Z A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity INGOLD, Pia V. DONNI, Mirjam Filip LIEVENS, Insight into assessors’ initial impressions has the potential to advance knowledge on how assessors form dimension-based judgments and on possible biases in these ratings. Therefore, this study draws on dual process theory to build and test a model that integrates assessors’ dimension ratings (i.e., systematic, slow, deliberate processing mode) with their initial impressions (i.e., intuitive, fast, automatic processing mode). Data collection started with an AC where assessors provided ratings of assessees, and an online survey of assessees’ supervisors who rated their job performance. In addition, two other rater pools provided initial impressions of these assessees by evaluating extracted 2-min video clips of their AC performance. Initial impressions from both of these samples were positively related to assessors’ dimension ratings, which supports assumptions from dual process theory and might explain why assessors’ dimensional ratings are often undifferentiated. Initial impressions did not appear to open up the doors for biases and stereotypes based upon appearance and perceptions of liking. Instead, assessors picked up information that assessees transmitted about their personality (i.e., Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability). Implications for further research on initial impressions and AC dimension ratings are discussed. 2018-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5932 info:doi/10.1037/apl0000333 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6931/viewcontent/Pia__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University assessment center initial impression dual process theory rating process criterion-related validity Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic assessment center
initial impression
dual process theory
rating process
criterion-related
validity
Human Resources Management
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle assessment center
initial impression
dual process theory
rating process
criterion-related
validity
Human Resources Management
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Theory
INGOLD, Pia V.
DONNI, Mirjam
Filip LIEVENS,
A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
description Insight into assessors’ initial impressions has the potential to advance knowledge on how assessors form dimension-based judgments and on possible biases in these ratings. Therefore, this study draws on dual process theory to build and test a model that integrates assessors’ dimension ratings (i.e., systematic, slow, deliberate processing mode) with their initial impressions (i.e., intuitive, fast, automatic processing mode). Data collection started with an AC where assessors provided ratings of assessees, and an online survey of assessees’ supervisors who rated their job performance. In addition, two other rater pools provided initial impressions of these assessees by evaluating extracted 2-min video clips of their AC performance. Initial impressions from both of these samples were positively related to assessors’ dimension ratings, which supports assumptions from dual process theory and might explain why assessors’ dimensional ratings are often undifferentiated. Initial impressions did not appear to open up the doors for biases and stereotypes based upon appearance and perceptions of liking. Instead, assessors picked up information that assessees transmitted about their personality (i.e., Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability). Implications for further research on initial impressions and AC dimension ratings are discussed.
format text
author INGOLD, Pia V.
DONNI, Mirjam
Filip LIEVENS,
author_facet INGOLD, Pia V.
DONNI, Mirjam
Filip LIEVENS,
author_sort INGOLD, Pia V.
title A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
title_short A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
title_full A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
title_fullStr A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
title_full_unstemmed A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
title_sort dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: the role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5932
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6931/viewcontent/Pia__1_.pdf
_version_ 1770574383222358016