A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity
Insight into assessors’ initial impressions has the potential to advance knowledge on how assessors form dimension-based judgments and on possible biases in these ratings. Therefore, this study draws on dual process theory to build and test a model that integrates assessors’ dimension ratings (i.e.,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5932 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6931/viewcontent/Pia__1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6931 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-69312019-05-22T12:51:53Z A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity INGOLD, Pia V. DONNI, Mirjam Filip LIEVENS, Insight into assessors’ initial impressions has the potential to advance knowledge on how assessors form dimension-based judgments and on possible biases in these ratings. Therefore, this study draws on dual process theory to build and test a model that integrates assessors’ dimension ratings (i.e., systematic, slow, deliberate processing mode) with their initial impressions (i.e., intuitive, fast, automatic processing mode). Data collection started with an AC where assessors provided ratings of assessees, and an online survey of assessees’ supervisors who rated their job performance. In addition, two other rater pools provided initial impressions of these assessees by evaluating extracted 2-min video clips of their AC performance. Initial impressions from both of these samples were positively related to assessors’ dimension ratings, which supports assumptions from dual process theory and might explain why assessors’ dimensional ratings are often undifferentiated. Initial impressions did not appear to open up the doors for biases and stereotypes based upon appearance and perceptions of liking. Instead, assessors picked up information that assessees transmitted about their personality (i.e., Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability). Implications for further research on initial impressions and AC dimension ratings are discussed. 2018-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5932 info:doi/10.1037/apl0000333 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6931/viewcontent/Pia__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University assessment center initial impression dual process theory rating process criterion-related validity Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
assessment center initial impression dual process theory rating process criterion-related validity Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
assessment center initial impression dual process theory rating process criterion-related validity Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory INGOLD, Pia V. DONNI, Mirjam Filip LIEVENS, A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity |
description |
Insight into assessors’ initial impressions has the potential to advance knowledge on how assessors form dimension-based judgments and on possible biases in these ratings. Therefore, this study draws on dual process theory to build and test a model that integrates assessors’ dimension ratings (i.e., systematic, slow, deliberate processing mode) with their initial impressions (i.e., intuitive, fast, automatic processing mode). Data collection started with an AC where assessors provided ratings of assessees, and an online survey of assessees’ supervisors who rated their job performance. In addition, two other rater pools provided initial impressions of these assessees by evaluating extracted 2-min video clips of their AC performance. Initial impressions from both of these samples were positively related to assessors’ dimension ratings, which supports assumptions from dual process theory and might explain why assessors’ dimensional ratings are often undifferentiated. Initial impressions did not appear to open up the doors for biases and stereotypes based upon appearance and perceptions of liking. Instead, assessors picked up information that assessees transmitted about their personality (i.e., Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability). Implications for further research on initial impressions and AC dimension ratings are discussed. |
format |
text |
author |
INGOLD, Pia V. DONNI, Mirjam Filip LIEVENS, |
author_facet |
INGOLD, Pia V. DONNI, Mirjam Filip LIEVENS, |
author_sort |
INGOLD, Pia V. |
title |
A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity |
title_short |
A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity |
title_full |
A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity |
title_fullStr |
A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity |
title_full_unstemmed |
A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity |
title_sort |
dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: the role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5932 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6931/viewcontent/Pia__1_.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574383222358016 |