Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy

Management consultancy is seen by many as a key agent in the adoption of new management ideas and practices in organizations. Two contrasting views are dominant-consultants as innovators, bringing new knowledge to their clients or as legitimating client knowledge. Those few studies which examine dir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: STURDY, Andrew, CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert, FINCHAM, Robin, HANDLEY, Karen
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6272
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7271/viewcontent/Between_innovation_2009_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7271
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-72712019-09-20T03:56:19Z Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy STURDY, Andrew CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert FINCHAM, Robin HANDLEY, Karen Management consultancy is seen by many as a key agent in the adoption of new management ideas and practices in organizations. Two contrasting views are dominant-consultants as innovators, bringing new knowledge to their clients or as legitimating client knowledge. Those few studies which examine directly the flow of knowledge through consultancy in projects with clients favour the innovator view and highlight the important analytical and practical value of boundaries-consultants as both knowledge and organizational outsiders. Likewise, in the legitimator view, the consultants' role is seen in terms of the primacy of the organizational boundary. By drawing on a wider social science literature on boundaries and studies of inter-organizational knowledge flow and management consultancy more generally, this polarity is seen as problematic, especially at the level of the consulting project. An alternative framework of boundary relations is developed and presented which incorporates their multiplicity, dynamism and situational specificity. This points to a greater complexity and variability in knowledge flow and its potential than is currently recognized. This is significant not only in terms of our understanding of management consultancy and inter-organizational knowledge dynamics and boundaries, but of a critical understanding of the role of management consultancy more generally. 2009-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6272 info:doi/10.1177/1350508409338435 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7271/viewcontent/Between_innovation_2009_av.pdf Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Boundaries Knowledge Innovation Management consultancy Legitimation Organizational Behavior and Theory Technology and Innovation
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Boundaries
Knowledge
Innovation
Management consultancy
Legitimation
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Technology and Innovation
spellingShingle Boundaries
Knowledge
Innovation
Management consultancy
Legitimation
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Technology and Innovation
STURDY, Andrew
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert
FINCHAM, Robin
HANDLEY, Karen
Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy
description Management consultancy is seen by many as a key agent in the adoption of new management ideas and practices in organizations. Two contrasting views are dominant-consultants as innovators, bringing new knowledge to their clients or as legitimating client knowledge. Those few studies which examine directly the flow of knowledge through consultancy in projects with clients favour the innovator view and highlight the important analytical and practical value of boundaries-consultants as both knowledge and organizational outsiders. Likewise, in the legitimator view, the consultants' role is seen in terms of the primacy of the organizational boundary. By drawing on a wider social science literature on boundaries and studies of inter-organizational knowledge flow and management consultancy more generally, this polarity is seen as problematic, especially at the level of the consulting project. An alternative framework of boundary relations is developed and presented which incorporates their multiplicity, dynamism and situational specificity. This points to a greater complexity and variability in knowledge flow and its potential than is currently recognized. This is significant not only in terms of our understanding of management consultancy and inter-organizational knowledge dynamics and boundaries, but of a critical understanding of the role of management consultancy more generally.
format text
author STURDY, Andrew
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert
FINCHAM, Robin
HANDLEY, Karen
author_facet STURDY, Andrew
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert
FINCHAM, Robin
HANDLEY, Karen
author_sort STURDY, Andrew
title Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy
title_short Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy
title_full Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy
title_fullStr Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy
title_full_unstemmed Between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy
title_sort between innovation and legitimation-boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6272
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7271/viewcontent/Between_innovation_2009_av.pdf
_version_ 1770574722647457792