Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress
Prior research assumes that high-status actors have greater organizational influence than lower-status ones, that is, it is easier for the former to get their ideas and initiatives adopted by the organization than it is for the latter. Drawing from the literature on ideology, we posit that the statu...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6508 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7507/viewcontent/Status_ideology_Organization_Studies_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7507 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-75072022-02-18T08:44:06Z Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress COLLET, Francois CARNABUCI, Gianluca ERTUG, Gokhan ZOU, Tengjian Prior research assumes that high-status actors have greater organizational influence than lower-status ones, that is, it is easier for the former to get their ideas and initiatives adopted by the organization than it is for the latter. Drawing from the literature on ideology, we posit that the status-influence link is contingent on actors’ ideological position. Specifically, status confers organizational influence to the degree that the focal actor is ideologically mainstream. The more an actor’s ideology deviates from the mainstream the less will her status translate into increased organizational influence. We find support for this hypothesis using data on the work of legislators in the House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress. By illuminating how and under what conditions status leads to increased influence, this study qualifies and extends current understandings of the role of status in organizations. 2022-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6508 info:doi/10.1177/0170840620907201 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7507/viewcontent/Status_ideology_Organization_Studies_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Status influence ideology social capital congress Applied Behavior Analysis Social Influence and Political Communication Strategic Management Policy |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Status influence ideology social capital congress Applied Behavior Analysis Social Influence and Political Communication Strategic Management Policy |
spellingShingle |
Status influence ideology social capital congress Applied Behavior Analysis Social Influence and Political Communication Strategic Management Policy COLLET, Francois CARNABUCI, Gianluca ERTUG, Gokhan ZOU, Tengjian Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress |
description |
Prior research assumes that high-status actors have greater organizational influence than lower-status ones, that is, it is easier for the former to get their ideas and initiatives adopted by the organization than it is for the latter. Drawing from the literature on ideology, we posit that the status-influence link is contingent on actors’ ideological position. Specifically, status confers organizational influence to the degree that the focal actor is ideologically mainstream. The more an actor’s ideology deviates from the mainstream the less will her status translate into increased organizational influence. We find support for this hypothesis using data on the work of legislators in the House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress. By illuminating how and under what conditions status leads to increased influence, this study qualifies and extends current understandings of the role of status in organizations. |
format |
text |
author |
COLLET, Francois CARNABUCI, Gianluca ERTUG, Gokhan ZOU, Tengjian |
author_facet |
COLLET, Francois CARNABUCI, Gianluca ERTUG, Gokhan ZOU, Tengjian |
author_sort |
COLLET, Francois |
title |
Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress |
title_short |
Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress |
title_full |
Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress |
title_fullStr |
Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress |
title_sort |
ideological boundaries of status advantages: legislative effectiveness in the house of representatives in the united states congress |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6508 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7507/viewcontent/Status_ideology_Organization_Studies_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575109858263040 |