Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress

Prior research assumes that high-status actors have greater organizational influence than lower-status ones, that is, it is easier for the former to get their ideas and initiatives adopted by the organization than it is for the latter. Drawing from the literature on ideology, we posit that the statu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: COLLET, Francois, CARNABUCI, Gianluca, ERTUG, Gokhan, ZOU, Tengjian
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6508
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7507/viewcontent/Status_ideology_Organization_Studies_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7507
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-75072022-02-18T08:44:06Z Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress COLLET, Francois CARNABUCI, Gianluca ERTUG, Gokhan ZOU, Tengjian Prior research assumes that high-status actors have greater organizational influence than lower-status ones, that is, it is easier for the former to get their ideas and initiatives adopted by the organization than it is for the latter. Drawing from the literature on ideology, we posit that the status-influence link is contingent on actors’ ideological position. Specifically, status confers organizational influence to the degree that the focal actor is ideologically mainstream. The more an actor’s ideology deviates from the mainstream the less will her status translate into increased organizational influence. We find support for this hypothesis using data on the work of legislators in the House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress. By illuminating how and under what conditions status leads to increased influence, this study qualifies and extends current understandings of the role of status in organizations. 2022-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6508 info:doi/10.1177/0170840620907201 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7507/viewcontent/Status_ideology_Organization_Studies_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Status influence ideology social capital congress Applied Behavior Analysis Social Influence and Political Communication Strategic Management Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Status
influence
ideology
social capital
congress
Applied Behavior Analysis
Social Influence and Political Communication
Strategic Management Policy
spellingShingle Status
influence
ideology
social capital
congress
Applied Behavior Analysis
Social Influence and Political Communication
Strategic Management Policy
COLLET, Francois
CARNABUCI, Gianluca
ERTUG, Gokhan
ZOU, Tengjian
Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress
description Prior research assumes that high-status actors have greater organizational influence than lower-status ones, that is, it is easier for the former to get their ideas and initiatives adopted by the organization than it is for the latter. Drawing from the literature on ideology, we posit that the status-influence link is contingent on actors’ ideological position. Specifically, status confers organizational influence to the degree that the focal actor is ideologically mainstream. The more an actor’s ideology deviates from the mainstream the less will her status translate into increased organizational influence. We find support for this hypothesis using data on the work of legislators in the House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress. By illuminating how and under what conditions status leads to increased influence, this study qualifies and extends current understandings of the role of status in organizations.
format text
author COLLET, Francois
CARNABUCI, Gianluca
ERTUG, Gokhan
ZOU, Tengjian
author_facet COLLET, Francois
CARNABUCI, Gianluca
ERTUG, Gokhan
ZOU, Tengjian
author_sort COLLET, Francois
title Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress
title_short Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress
title_full Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress
title_fullStr Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress
title_full_unstemmed Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress
title_sort ideological boundaries of status advantages: legislative effectiveness in the house of representatives in the united states congress
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6508
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7507/viewcontent/Status_ideology_Organization_Studies_av.pdf
_version_ 1770575109858263040