Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants

Some scholars suggest that organizations could improve their hiring decisions by measuring the personal values of job applicants, arguing that values provide insights into applicants’ cultural fit, retention prospects, and performance outcomes. However, others have expressed concerns about response...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ANGLIM, Jeromy, MOLLOY, Karlyn, DUNLOP, Patrick D., ALBRECHT, Simon L., LIEVENS, Filip, ANDREW, Marty
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6864
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7863/viewcontent/EWO_514.20.R2_Proof_hi__4_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7863
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-78632024-03-20T03:08:21Z Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants ANGLIM, Jeromy MOLLOY, Karlyn DUNLOP, Patrick D. ALBRECHT, Simon L. LIEVENS, Filip ANDREW, Marty Some scholars suggest that organizations could improve their hiring decisions by measuring the personal values of job applicants, arguing that values provide insights into applicants’ cultural fit, retention prospects, and performance outcomes. However, others have expressed concerns about response distortion and faking. The current study provides the first large-scale investigation of the effect of the job applicant context on the psychometric structure and scale means of a self-reported values measure. Participants comprised 7,884 job applicants (41% male; age M = 43.32, SD = 10.76) and a country-, age-, and gender-matched comparison sample of 1,806 non-applicants (41% male; age M = 44.72, SD = 10.97), along with a small repeated-measures, cross-context sample. Respondents completed the 57-item Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) measuring Schwartz’ universal personal values. Compared to matched non-applicants, applicants reported valuing power and self-direction considerably less, and conformity and universalism considerably more. Applicants also reported valuing security, tradition, and benevolence more than non-applicants, and reported valuing stimulation, hedonism, and achievement less than non-applicants. Despite applicants appearing to embellish the degree to which their values aligned with being responsible and considerate workers, invariance testing suggested that the underlying structure of values assessment is largely preserved in job applicant contexts. 2022-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6864 info:doi/10.1080/1359432X.2021.2008911 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7863/viewcontent/EWO_514.20.R2_Proof_hi__4_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Schwartz values personnel selection faking response distortion personal values Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Schwartz values
personnel selection
faking
response distortion
personal values
Human Resources Management
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Schwartz values
personnel selection
faking
response distortion
personal values
Human Resources Management
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Theory
ANGLIM, Jeromy
MOLLOY, Karlyn
DUNLOP, Patrick D.
ALBRECHT, Simon L.
LIEVENS, Filip
ANDREW, Marty
Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants
description Some scholars suggest that organizations could improve their hiring decisions by measuring the personal values of job applicants, arguing that values provide insights into applicants’ cultural fit, retention prospects, and performance outcomes. However, others have expressed concerns about response distortion and faking. The current study provides the first large-scale investigation of the effect of the job applicant context on the psychometric structure and scale means of a self-reported values measure. Participants comprised 7,884 job applicants (41% male; age M = 43.32, SD = 10.76) and a country-, age-, and gender-matched comparison sample of 1,806 non-applicants (41% male; age M = 44.72, SD = 10.97), along with a small repeated-measures, cross-context sample. Respondents completed the 57-item Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) measuring Schwartz’ universal personal values. Compared to matched non-applicants, applicants reported valuing power and self-direction considerably less, and conformity and universalism considerably more. Applicants also reported valuing security, tradition, and benevolence more than non-applicants, and reported valuing stimulation, hedonism, and achievement less than non-applicants. Despite applicants appearing to embellish the degree to which their values aligned with being responsible and considerate workers, invariance testing suggested that the underlying structure of values assessment is largely preserved in job applicant contexts.
format text
author ANGLIM, Jeromy
MOLLOY, Karlyn
DUNLOP, Patrick D.
ALBRECHT, Simon L.
LIEVENS, Filip
ANDREW, Marty
author_facet ANGLIM, Jeromy
MOLLOY, Karlyn
DUNLOP, Patrick D.
ALBRECHT, Simon L.
LIEVENS, Filip
ANDREW, Marty
author_sort ANGLIM, Jeromy
title Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants
title_short Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants
title_full Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants
title_fullStr Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants
title_full_unstemmed Values assessment for personnel selection: Comparing job applicants to non-applicants
title_sort values assessment for personnel selection: comparing job applicants to non-applicants
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6864
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7863/viewcontent/EWO_514.20.R2_Proof_hi__4_.pdf
_version_ 1794549871014838272