Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology
Multiplexity, the coexistence of more than one type of relationship between two actors, is a prevalent phenomenon with clear relevance for a wide range of management settings and phenomena. While there is a substantial body of work on multiplexity, the absence of a shared terminology and a typology...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7632 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8631/viewcontent/Multiplexity_pv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8631 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-86312024-12-19T01:28:46Z Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology ERTUG, Gokhan BRENNECKE, Julia TASSELLI, Stefano Multiplexity, the coexistence of more than one type of relationship between two actors, is a prevalent phenomenon with clear relevance for a wide range of management settings and phenomena. While there is a substantial body of work on multiplexity, the absence of a shared terminology and a typology for the mechanisms and arguments that are used in theorizing about its implications nevertheless hamper its appeal to organizational network scholars and slow its progress. Based on content analysis of 103 studies, we propose “relational harmony,” “task complementarity,” and “relational scope” as three categories to integrate the mechanisms and arguments used in the literature to theorize about the implications of multiplexity. We then survey the literature in light of this typology to show how it is also useful in revealing patterns of theorizing; for example, with respect to the types of relationships that are studied in relation to multiplexity. We conclude with suggestions for future research directions, focusing on how these can be pursued based on our integrative typology. We hope that the common ground we provide for theorizing about the implications of multiplexity will make it an even more engaging topic for organizational network and management scholars, and place it in the company of more prominently used relational constructs in management research, as aligned with its prevalence and relevance. 2023-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7632 info:doi/10.5465/annals.2021.0193 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8631/viewcontent/Multiplexity_pv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory Strategic Management Policy |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Strategic Management Policy |
spellingShingle |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Strategic Management Policy ERTUG, Gokhan BRENNECKE, Julia TASSELLI, Stefano Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology |
description |
Multiplexity, the coexistence of more than one type of relationship between two actors, is a prevalent phenomenon with clear relevance for a wide range of management settings and phenomena. While there is a substantial body of work on multiplexity, the absence of a shared terminology and a typology for the mechanisms and arguments that are used in theorizing about its implications nevertheless hamper its appeal to organizational network scholars and slow its progress. Based on content analysis of 103 studies, we propose “relational harmony,” “task complementarity,” and “relational scope” as three categories to integrate the mechanisms and arguments used in the literature to theorize about the implications of multiplexity. We then survey the literature in light of this typology to show how it is also useful in revealing patterns of theorizing; for example, with respect to the types of relationships that are studied in relation to multiplexity. We conclude with suggestions for future research directions, focusing on how these can be pursued based on our integrative typology. We hope that the common ground we provide for theorizing about the implications of multiplexity will make it an even more engaging topic for organizational network and management scholars, and place it in the company of more prominently used relational constructs in management research, as aligned with its prevalence and relevance. |
format |
text |
author |
ERTUG, Gokhan BRENNECKE, Julia TASSELLI, Stefano |
author_facet |
ERTUG, Gokhan BRENNECKE, Julia TASSELLI, Stefano |
author_sort |
ERTUG, Gokhan |
title |
Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology |
title_short |
Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology |
title_full |
Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology |
title_fullStr |
Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology |
title_sort |
theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: an integrative typology |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7632 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8631/viewcontent/Multiplexity_pv.pdf |
_version_ |
1819113149225238528 |