Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology

Multiplexity, the coexistence of more than one type of relationship between two actors, is a prevalent phenomenon with clear relevance for a wide range of management settings and phenomena. While there is a substantial body of work on multiplexity, the absence of a shared terminology and a typology...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ERTUG, Gokhan, BRENNECKE, Julia, TASSELLI, Stefano
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7632
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8631/viewcontent/Multiplexity_pv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8631
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-86312024-12-19T01:28:46Z Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology ERTUG, Gokhan BRENNECKE, Julia TASSELLI, Stefano Multiplexity, the coexistence of more than one type of relationship between two actors, is a prevalent phenomenon with clear relevance for a wide range of management settings and phenomena. While there is a substantial body of work on multiplexity, the absence of a shared terminology and a typology for the mechanisms and arguments that are used in theorizing about its implications nevertheless hamper its appeal to organizational network scholars and slow its progress. Based on content analysis of 103 studies, we propose “relational harmony,” “task complementarity,” and “relational scope” as three categories to integrate the mechanisms and arguments used in the literature to theorize about the implications of multiplexity. We then survey the literature in light of this typology to show how it is also useful in revealing patterns of theorizing; for example, with respect to the types of relationships that are studied in relation to multiplexity. We conclude with suggestions for future research directions, focusing on how these can be pursued based on our integrative typology. We hope that the common ground we provide for theorizing about the implications of multiplexity will make it an even more engaging topic for organizational network and management scholars, and place it in the company of more prominently used relational constructs in management research, as aligned with its prevalence and relevance. 2023-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7632 info:doi/10.5465/annals.2021.0193 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8631/viewcontent/Multiplexity_pv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory Strategic Management Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Organizational Behavior and Theory
Strategic Management Policy
spellingShingle Organizational Behavior and Theory
Strategic Management Policy
ERTUG, Gokhan
BRENNECKE, Julia
TASSELLI, Stefano
Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology
description Multiplexity, the coexistence of more than one type of relationship between two actors, is a prevalent phenomenon with clear relevance for a wide range of management settings and phenomena. While there is a substantial body of work on multiplexity, the absence of a shared terminology and a typology for the mechanisms and arguments that are used in theorizing about its implications nevertheless hamper its appeal to organizational network scholars and slow its progress. Based on content analysis of 103 studies, we propose “relational harmony,” “task complementarity,” and “relational scope” as three categories to integrate the mechanisms and arguments used in the literature to theorize about the implications of multiplexity. We then survey the literature in light of this typology to show how it is also useful in revealing patterns of theorizing; for example, with respect to the types of relationships that are studied in relation to multiplexity. We conclude with suggestions for future research directions, focusing on how these can be pursued based on our integrative typology. We hope that the common ground we provide for theorizing about the implications of multiplexity will make it an even more engaging topic for organizational network and management scholars, and place it in the company of more prominently used relational constructs in management research, as aligned with its prevalence and relevance.
format text
author ERTUG, Gokhan
BRENNECKE, Julia
TASSELLI, Stefano
author_facet ERTUG, Gokhan
BRENNECKE, Julia
TASSELLI, Stefano
author_sort ERTUG, Gokhan
title Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology
title_short Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology
title_full Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology
title_fullStr Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology
title_full_unstemmed Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology
title_sort theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: an integrative typology
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7632
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8631/viewcontent/Multiplexity_pv.pdf
_version_ 1819113149225238528