Themis: Automatic and efficient deep learning system testing with strong fault detection capability

Deep Learning Systems (DLSs) have been widely applied in safety-critical tasks such as autopilot. However, when a perturbed input is fed into a DLS for inference, the DLS often has incorrect outputs (i.e., faults). DLS testing techniques (e.g., DeepXplore) detect such faults by generating perturbed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HUANG, Dong, LI, Tsz On, XIE, Xiaofei, CUI, Heming
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9509
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10509/viewcontent/Themis_Automatic_and_Efficient_Deep_Learning_Syste.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Deep Learning Systems (DLSs) have been widely applied in safety-critical tasks such as autopilot. However, when a perturbed input is fed into a DLS for inference, the DLS often has incorrect outputs (i.e., faults). DLS testing techniques (e.g., DeepXplore) detect such faults by generating perturbed inputs to explore data flows that induce faults. Since a DLS often has infinitely many data flows, existing techniques require developers to manually specify a set of activation values in a DLS’s neurons for exploring fault-inducing data flows. Unfortunately, recent studies show that such manual effort is tedious and can detect only a tiny proportion of fault-inducing data flows. In this paper, we present Themis, the first automatic DLS testing system, which attains strong fault detection capability by ensuring a full coverage of fault-inducing data flows at a high probability. Themis carries a new workflow for automatically and systematically revealing data flows whose internal neurons’ outputs vary substantially when the inputs are slightly perturbed, as these data flows are likely fault-inducing. We evaluated Themis on ten different DLSs and found that on average the number of faults detected by Themis was 3.78X more than four notable DLS testing techniques. By retraining all evaluated DLSs with the detected faults, Themis also increased (regained) these DLSs’ accuracies on average 14.7X higher than all baselines.