To What Extent Could We Detect Field Defects? —An Empirical Study of False Negatives in Static Bug Finding Tools
Software defects can cause much loss. Static bug-finding tools are believed to help detect and remove defects. These tools are designed to find programming errors; but, do they in fact help prevent actual defects that occur in the field and reported by users? If these tools had been used, would they...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Thung, Ferdian, Lucia, -, LO, David, JIANG, Lingxiao, Devanbu, Premkumar, Rahman, Foyzur |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/1570 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2351685 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
To what extent could we detect field defects? An empirical study of false negatives in static bug finding tools
by: THUNG, Ferdian, et al.
Published: (2012) -
To what extent could we detect field defects? An extended empirical study of false negatives in static bug finding tools
by: THUNG, Ferdian, et al.
Published: (2014) -
How to find actionable static analysis warnings: A case study with FindBugs
by: YEDIDA, Rahul, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Empirical evaluation of bug linking
by: BISSYANDE, Tegawende F., et al.
Published: (2013) -
Dual analysis for proving safety and finding bugs
by: Popeea, C., et al.
Published: (2013)