Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives
Practical mechanisms for procurement involve bidding, negotiation, transfer payments and subsidies, and the possibility of verification of unobservable product and service quality. We model two proposed multi-stage procurement mechanisms. One focuses on the auction price that is established, and the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2188 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-3188 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-31882014-04-02T10:22:16Z Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives Huang, H. Kauffman, Robert John Xu, H. Zhao, L. Practical mechanisms for procurement involve bidding, negotiation, transfer payments and subsidies, and the possibility of verification of unobservable product and service quality. We model two proposed multi-stage procurement mechanisms. One focuses on the auction price that is established, and the other emphasizes price negotiation. Both also emphasize quality and offer incentives for the unobservable level of a supplier’s effort, while addressing the buyer’s satisfaction. Our results show that, with the appropriate incentive, which we will refer to as a qualityeffort bonus, the supplier will exert more effort to supply higher quality goods or services after winning the procurement auction. We also find that a mechanism incorporating price and quality negotiation improves the supply chain’s surplus and generates the possibility of Pareto optimal improvement in comparison to a mechanism that emphasizes the auction price only. From the buyer’s perspective though, either mechanism can dominate the other, depending on the circumstances of procurement. Thus, post-auction negotiation may not always be optimal for the buyer, although it always produces first-best goods or service quality outcomes. The buyer’s choice between mechanisms will be influenced by different values of the quality effort bonus. For managers in practice, our analysis shows that it is possible to simplify the optimization procedure by using a new approach for selecting the appropriate mechanism and determining what value of the incentive for the supplier makes sense. 2011-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2188 info:doi/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.12.002 Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Auctions Bonuses Buyers Economic modeling Incentives Information asymmetries Mechanism design Negotiation Procurement Supply quality Supplier selection Unobservable quality Computer Sciences |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Auctions Bonuses Buyers Economic modeling Incentives Information asymmetries Mechanism design Negotiation Procurement Supply quality Supplier selection Unobservable quality Computer Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Auctions Bonuses Buyers Economic modeling Incentives Information asymmetries Mechanism design Negotiation Procurement Supply quality Supplier selection Unobservable quality Computer Sciences Huang, H. Kauffman, Robert John Xu, H. Zhao, L. Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives |
description |
Practical mechanisms for procurement involve bidding, negotiation, transfer payments and subsidies, and the possibility of verification of unobservable product and service quality. We model two proposed multi-stage procurement mechanisms. One focuses on the auction price that is established, and the other emphasizes price negotiation. Both also emphasize quality and offer incentives for the unobservable level of a supplier’s effort, while addressing the buyer’s satisfaction. Our results show that, with the appropriate incentive, which we will refer to as a qualityeffort bonus, the supplier will exert more effort to supply higher quality goods or services after winning the procurement auction. We also find that a mechanism incorporating price and quality negotiation improves the supply chain’s surplus and generates the possibility of Pareto optimal improvement in comparison to a mechanism that emphasizes the auction price only. From the buyer’s perspective though, either mechanism can dominate the other, depending on the circumstances of procurement. Thus, post-auction negotiation may not always be optimal for the buyer, although it always produces first-best goods or service quality outcomes. The buyer’s choice between mechanisms will be influenced by different values of the quality effort bonus. For managers in practice, our analysis shows that it is possible to simplify the optimization procedure by using a new approach for selecting the appropriate mechanism and determining what value of the incentive for the supplier makes sense. |
format |
text |
author |
Huang, H. Kauffman, Robert John Xu, H. Zhao, L. |
author_facet |
Huang, H. Kauffman, Robert John Xu, H. Zhao, L. |
author_sort |
Huang, H. |
title |
Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives |
title_short |
Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives |
title_full |
Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives |
title_fullStr |
Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives |
title_sort |
mechanism design for e-procurement auctions: on the efficacy of post-auction negotiation and quality effort incentives |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2188 |
_version_ |
1770571833619251200 |