Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives

Practical mechanisms for procurement involve bidding, negotiation, transfer payments and subsidies, and the possibility of verification of unobservable product and service quality. We model two proposed multi-stage procurement mechanisms. One focuses on the auction price that is established, and the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, H., Kauffman, Robert John, Xu, H., Zhao, L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2188
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-3188
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-31882014-04-02T10:22:16Z Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives Huang, H. Kauffman, Robert John Xu, H. Zhao, L. Practical mechanisms for procurement involve bidding, negotiation, transfer payments and subsidies, and the possibility of verification of unobservable product and service quality. We model two proposed multi-stage procurement mechanisms. One focuses on the auction price that is established, and the other emphasizes price negotiation. Both also emphasize quality and offer incentives for the unobservable level of a supplier’s effort, while addressing the buyer’s satisfaction. Our results show that, with the appropriate incentive, which we will refer to as a qualityeffort bonus, the supplier will exert more effort to supply higher quality goods or services after winning the procurement auction. We also find that a mechanism incorporating price and quality negotiation improves the supply chain’s surplus and generates the possibility of Pareto optimal improvement in comparison to a mechanism that emphasizes the auction price only. From the buyer’s perspective though, either mechanism can dominate the other, depending on the circumstances of procurement. Thus, post-auction negotiation may not always be optimal for the buyer, although it always produces first-best goods or service quality outcomes. The buyer’s choice between mechanisms will be influenced by different values of the quality effort bonus. For managers in practice, our analysis shows that it is possible to simplify the optimization procedure by using a new approach for selecting the appropriate mechanism and determining what value of the incentive for the supplier makes sense. 2011-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2188 info:doi/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.12.002 Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Auctions Bonuses Buyers Economic modeling Incentives Information asymmetries Mechanism design Negotiation Procurement Supply quality Supplier selection Unobservable quality Computer Sciences
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Auctions
Bonuses
Buyers
Economic modeling
Incentives
Information asymmetries
Mechanism design
Negotiation
Procurement
Supply quality
Supplier selection
Unobservable quality
Computer Sciences
spellingShingle Auctions
Bonuses
Buyers
Economic modeling
Incentives
Information asymmetries
Mechanism design
Negotiation
Procurement
Supply quality
Supplier selection
Unobservable quality
Computer Sciences
Huang, H.
Kauffman, Robert John
Xu, H.
Zhao, L.
Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives
description Practical mechanisms for procurement involve bidding, negotiation, transfer payments and subsidies, and the possibility of verification of unobservable product and service quality. We model two proposed multi-stage procurement mechanisms. One focuses on the auction price that is established, and the other emphasizes price negotiation. Both also emphasize quality and offer incentives for the unobservable level of a supplier’s effort, while addressing the buyer’s satisfaction. Our results show that, with the appropriate incentive, which we will refer to as a qualityeffort bonus, the supplier will exert more effort to supply higher quality goods or services after winning the procurement auction. We also find that a mechanism incorporating price and quality negotiation improves the supply chain’s surplus and generates the possibility of Pareto optimal improvement in comparison to a mechanism that emphasizes the auction price only. From the buyer’s perspective though, either mechanism can dominate the other, depending on the circumstances of procurement. Thus, post-auction negotiation may not always be optimal for the buyer, although it always produces first-best goods or service quality outcomes. The buyer’s choice between mechanisms will be influenced by different values of the quality effort bonus. For managers in practice, our analysis shows that it is possible to simplify the optimization procedure by using a new approach for selecting the appropriate mechanism and determining what value of the incentive for the supplier makes sense.
format text
author Huang, H.
Kauffman, Robert John
Xu, H.
Zhao, L.
author_facet Huang, H.
Kauffman, Robert John
Xu, H.
Zhao, L.
author_sort Huang, H.
title Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives
title_short Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives
title_full Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives
title_fullStr Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives
title_full_unstemmed Mechanism Design for E-Procurement Auctions: On the Efficacy of Post-Auction Negotiation and Quality Effort Incentives
title_sort mechanism design for e-procurement auctions: on the efficacy of post-auction negotiation and quality effort incentives
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2011
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2188
_version_ 1770571833619251200