To what extent could we detect field defects? An extended empirical study of false negatives in static bug finding tools
Software defects can cause much loss. Static bug-finding tools are designed to detect and remove software defects and believed to be effective. However, do such tools in fact help prevent actual defects that occur in the field and reported by users? If these tools had been used, would they have dete...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | THUNG, Ferdian, Lucia, Lucia, LO, David, JIANG, Lingxiao, RAHMAN, Foyzur, DEVANBU, Premkumar |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2435 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/3435/viewcontent/art_3A10.1007_2Fs10515_014_0169_8.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
To what extent could we detect field defects? An empirical study of false negatives in static bug finding tools
by: THUNG, Ferdian, et al.
Published: (2012) -
To What Extent Could We Detect Field Defects? —An Empirical Study of False Negatives in Static Bug Finding Tools
by: Thung, Ferdian, et al.
Published: (2012) -
How to find actionable static analysis warnings: A case study with FindBugs
by: YEDIDA, Rahul, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?
by: ZHANG, Ting, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Empirical evaluation of bug linking
by: BISSYANDE, Tegawende F., et al.
Published: (2013)