Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media
Social media users make decisions about what content to post and read. As posted content is often visible to others, users are likely to impose self-censorship when deciding what content to post. On the other hand, such a concern may not apply to reading social media content. As a result, the topics...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3133 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4133/viewcontent/152___Posting_Topics_Are_Not_Reading_Topics__NETSciX2016_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-4133 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-41332018-07-13T04:42:24Z Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media GONG, Wei LIM, Ee-peng ZHU, Feida Social media users make decisions about what content to post and read. As posted content is often visible to others, users are likely to impose self-censorship when deciding what content to post. On the other hand, such a concern may not apply to reading social media content. As a result, the topics of content that a user posted and read can be different and this has major implications to the applications that require personalization. To better determine and profile social media users’ topic interests, we conduct a user survey in Twitter. In this survey, participants chose the topics they like to post (posting topics) and the topics they like to read (reading topics). We observe that users’ posting topics differ from their reading topics significantly. We find that some topics such as “Religion”, “Business” and “Politics” attract much more users to read than to post. With the ground truth data obtained from the survey, we further explore the discovery of users’ posting and reading topics separately using features derived from their posted content, received content and social networks. 2016-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3133 info:doi/10.1007/978-3-319-28361-6_2 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4133/viewcontent/152___Posting_Topics_Are_Not_Reading_Topics__NETSciX2016_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems Social Media |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Databases and Information Systems Social Media |
spellingShingle |
Databases and Information Systems Social Media GONG, Wei LIM, Ee-peng ZHU, Feida Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media |
description |
Social media users make decisions about what content to post and read. As posted content is often visible to others, users are likely to impose self-censorship when deciding what content to post. On the other hand, such a concern may not apply to reading social media content. As a result, the topics of content that a user posted and read can be different and this has major implications to the applications that require personalization. To better determine and profile social media users’ topic interests, we conduct a user survey in Twitter. In this survey, participants chose the topics they like to post (posting topics) and the topics they like to read (reading topics). We observe that users’ posting topics differ from their reading topics significantly. We find that some topics such as “Religion”, “Business” and “Politics” attract much more users to read than to post. With the ground truth data obtained from the survey, we further explore the discovery of users’ posting and reading topics separately using features derived from their posted content, received content and social networks. |
format |
text |
author |
GONG, Wei LIM, Ee-peng ZHU, Feida |
author_facet |
GONG, Wei LIM, Ee-peng ZHU, Feida |
author_sort |
GONG, Wei |
title |
Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media |
title_short |
Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media |
title_full |
Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media |
title_fullStr |
Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media |
title_full_unstemmed |
Posting Topics ≠ Reading Topics: On Discovering Posting and Reading Topics in Social Media |
title_sort |
posting topics ≠ reading topics: on discovering posting and reading topics in social media |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3133 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4133/viewcontent/152___Posting_Topics_Are_Not_Reading_Topics__NETSciX2016_.pdf |
_version_ |
1770572822166372352 |