Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs
Bug resolution refers to the activity that developers perform to diagnose, fix, test, and document bugs during software development and maintenance. Given a bug report, we would like to recommend the set of bug resolvers that could potentially contribute their knowledge to fix it. We refer to this p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3197 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-4198 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-41982016-08-10T07:42:05Z Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs XIA, Xin David LO, WANG, Xinyu ZHOU, Bo Bug resolution refers to the activity that developers perform to diagnose, fix, test, and document bugs during software development and maintenance. Given a bug report, we would like to recommend the set of bug resolvers that could potentially contribute their knowledge to fix it. We refer to this problem as developer recommendation for bug resolution. In this paper, we propose a new and accurate method named DevRec for the developer recommendation problem. DevRec is a composite method that performs two kinds of analysis: bug reports based analysis (BR-Based analysis) and developer based analysis (D-Based analysis). We evaluate our solution on five large bug report datasets including GNU Compiler Collection, OpenOffice, Mozilla, Netbeans, and Eclipse containing a total of 107,875 bug reports. We show that DevRec could achieve recall@5 and recall@10 scores of 0.4826-0.7989, and 0.6063-0.8924, respectively. The results show that DevRec on average improves recall@5 and recall@10 scores of Bugzie by 57.55% and 39.39%, outperforms DREX by 165.38% and 89.36%, and outperforms NonTraining by 212.39% and 168.01%, respectively. Moreover, we evaluate the stableness of DevRec with different parameters, and the results show that the performance of DevRec is stable for a wide range of parameters. 2015-03-03T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3197 info:doi/10.1002/smr.1706 Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Composite Developer recommendation Multi-label learning Topic model Computer Sciences Databases and Information Systems Information Security |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Composite Developer recommendation Multi-label learning Topic model Computer Sciences Databases and Information Systems Information Security |
spellingShingle |
Composite Developer recommendation Multi-label learning Topic model Computer Sciences Databases and Information Systems Information Security XIA, Xin David LO, WANG, Xinyu ZHOU, Bo Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs |
description |
Bug resolution refers to the activity that developers perform to diagnose, fix, test, and document bugs during software development and maintenance. Given a bug report, we would like to recommend the set of bug resolvers that could potentially contribute their knowledge to fix it. We refer to this problem as developer recommendation for bug resolution. In this paper, we propose a new and accurate method named DevRec for the developer recommendation problem. DevRec is a composite method that performs two kinds of analysis: bug reports based analysis (BR-Based analysis) and developer based analysis (D-Based analysis). We evaluate our solution on five large bug report datasets including GNU Compiler Collection, OpenOffice, Mozilla, Netbeans, and Eclipse containing a total of 107,875 bug reports. We show that DevRec could achieve recall@5 and recall@10 scores of 0.4826-0.7989, and 0.6063-0.8924, respectively. The results show that DevRec on average improves recall@5 and recall@10 scores of Bugzie by 57.55% and 39.39%, outperforms DREX by 165.38% and 89.36%, and outperforms NonTraining by 212.39% and 168.01%, respectively. Moreover, we evaluate the stableness of DevRec with different parameters, and the results show that the performance of DevRec is stable for a wide range of parameters. |
format |
text |
author |
XIA, Xin David LO, WANG, Xinyu ZHOU, Bo |
author_facet |
XIA, Xin David LO, WANG, Xinyu ZHOU, Bo |
author_sort |
XIA, Xin |
title |
Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs |
title_short |
Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs |
title_full |
Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs |
title_fullStr |
Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dual Analysis for Recommending Developers to Resolve Bugs |
title_sort |
dual analysis for recommending developers to resolve bugs |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3197 |
_version_ |
1770572975821553664 |