Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation
This paper shows how knowledge, in the form of fuzzy rules, can be derived from a supervised learning neural network called fuzzy ARTMAP. Rule extraction proceeds in two stages: pruning, which simplifies the network structure by removing excessive recognition categories and weights; and quantization...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1995
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6281 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7284/viewcontent/ARTMAP_Rule_Extraction_CS95.PDF |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-7284 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-72842021-11-23T07:58:58Z Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation CARPENTER, Gail A. TAN, Ah-hwee This paper shows how knowledge, in the form of fuzzy rules, can be derived from a supervised learning neural network called fuzzy ARTMAP. Rule extraction proceeds in two stages: pruning, which simplifies the network structure by removing excessive recognition categories and weights; and quantization of continuous learned weights, which allows the final system state to be translated into a usable set of descriptive rules. Three benchmark studies illustrate the rule extraction methods: (1) Pima Indian diabetes diagnosis, (2) mushroom classification and (3) DNA promoter recognition. Fuzzy ARTMAP and ART-EMAP are compared with the ADAP algorithm, the k nearest neighbor system, the back-propagation network and the C4.5 decision tree. The ARTMAP rule extraction procedure is also compared with the Knowledgetron and NOFM algorithms, which extract rules from back-propagation networks. Simulation results consistently indicate that ARTMAP rule extraction produces compact sets of comprehensible rules for which accuracy and complexity compare favorably to rules extracted by alternative algorithms. 1995-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6281 info:doi/10.1080/09540099508915655 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7284/viewcontent/ARTMAP_Rule_Extraction_CS95.PDF http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Fuzzy ARTMAP rule confidence factor pruning Databases and Information Systems Systems Architecture Theory and Algorithms |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Fuzzy ARTMAP rule confidence factor pruning Databases and Information Systems Systems Architecture Theory and Algorithms |
spellingShingle |
Fuzzy ARTMAP rule confidence factor pruning Databases and Information Systems Systems Architecture Theory and Algorithms CARPENTER, Gail A. TAN, Ah-hwee Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation |
description |
This paper shows how knowledge, in the form of fuzzy rules, can be derived from a supervised learning neural network called fuzzy ARTMAP. Rule extraction proceeds in two stages: pruning, which simplifies the network structure by removing excessive recognition categories and weights; and quantization of continuous learned weights, which allows the final system state to be translated into a usable set of descriptive rules. Three benchmark studies illustrate the rule extraction methods: (1) Pima Indian diabetes diagnosis, (2) mushroom classification and (3) DNA promoter recognition. Fuzzy ARTMAP and ART-EMAP are compared with the ADAP algorithm, the k nearest neighbor system, the back-propagation network and the C4.5 decision tree. The ARTMAP rule extraction procedure is also compared with the Knowledgetron and NOFM algorithms, which extract rules from back-propagation networks. Simulation results consistently indicate that ARTMAP rule extraction produces compact sets of comprehensible rules for which accuracy and complexity compare favorably to rules extracted by alternative algorithms. |
format |
text |
author |
CARPENTER, Gail A. TAN, Ah-hwee |
author_facet |
CARPENTER, Gail A. TAN, Ah-hwee |
author_sort |
CARPENTER, Gail A. |
title |
Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation |
title_short |
Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation |
title_full |
Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation |
title_fullStr |
Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rule extraction: From neural architecture to symbolic representation |
title_sort |
rule extraction: from neural architecture to symbolic representation |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
1995 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6281 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7284/viewcontent/ARTMAP_Rule_Extraction_CS95.PDF |
_version_ |
1770575914708500480 |