A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus

Quantum computing is coming of age and being explored in many business areas for either solving difficult problems or improving business processes. Distributed ledger technology (DLT) is now embedded in many businesses and continues to mature. Consensus, at the heart of DLTs, has practical scaling i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: GRIFFIN, Paul Robert, MEVADA, Dimple
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7175
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8178/viewcontent/Quantum_Leaderless_Consensus_IEEE.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-8178
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-81782022-07-15T10:12:18Z A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus GRIFFIN, Paul Robert MEVADA, Dimple Quantum computing is coming of age and being explored in many business areas for either solving difficult problems or improving business processes. Distributed ledger technology (DLT) is now embedded in many businesses and continues to mature. Consensus, at the heart of DLTs, has practical scaling issues and, as we move into needing bigger datasets, bigger networks and more security, the problem is ever increasing. Consensus agreement is a non-deterministic problem which is a good match to quantum computers due to the probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena. In this paper, we show that quantum nodes entangled in a variety of network topologies perform similarly to classical consensus executed on quantum simulators and real quantum computers with and without noise mitigation. There is no difference in the average time for the network to agree but there is a higher variation in agreement times for quantum compared to classical systems. The implication is that, with continued improvement in quantum technology, the scale and advantages of quantum processing can be exploited to provide for bigger and more sophisticated consensus. Furthermore, exploring the variation in agreement time could potentially lead to shorter consensus times. 2022-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7175 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8178/viewcontent/Quantum_Leaderless_Consensus_IEEE.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems Software Engineering
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Databases and Information Systems
Software Engineering
spellingShingle Databases and Information Systems
Software Engineering
GRIFFIN, Paul Robert
MEVADA, Dimple
A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus
description Quantum computing is coming of age and being explored in many business areas for either solving difficult problems or improving business processes. Distributed ledger technology (DLT) is now embedded in many businesses and continues to mature. Consensus, at the heart of DLTs, has practical scaling issues and, as we move into needing bigger datasets, bigger networks and more security, the problem is ever increasing. Consensus agreement is a non-deterministic problem which is a good match to quantum computers due to the probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena. In this paper, we show that quantum nodes entangled in a variety of network topologies perform similarly to classical consensus executed on quantum simulators and real quantum computers with and without noise mitigation. There is no difference in the average time for the network to agree but there is a higher variation in agreement times for quantum compared to classical systems. The implication is that, with continued improvement in quantum technology, the scale and advantages of quantum processing can be exploited to provide for bigger and more sophisticated consensus. Furthermore, exploring the variation in agreement time could potentially lead to shorter consensus times.
format text
author GRIFFIN, Paul Robert
MEVADA, Dimple
author_facet GRIFFIN, Paul Robert
MEVADA, Dimple
author_sort GRIFFIN, Paul Robert
title A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus
title_short A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus
title_full A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus
title_fullStr A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus
title_full_unstemmed A practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus
title_sort practical comparison of quantum and classical leaderless consensus
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7175
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8178/viewcontent/Quantum_Leaderless_Consensus_IEEE.pdf
_version_ 1770576252244066304