Self-checking deep neural networks for anomalies and adversaries in deployment

• Main Authors: XIAO, Yan, BESCHASTNIKH, Ivan, LIN, Yun, HUNDAL, Rajdeep Singh, XIE, Xiaofei, ROSENBLUM, David S., DONG, Jin Song
• Format: text
• Language: English
• Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
• Subjects: self-checking system; trustworthiness; deep neural networks; adversarial examples; deployment; Artificial Intelligence and Robotics; OS and Networks
• Online Access: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7493; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8496/viewcontent/tdsc22_selfchecker.pdf
• Institution: Singapore Management University

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have been widely adopted, yet DNN models are surprisingly unreliable, which raises significant concerns about their use in critical domains. In this work, we propose that runtime DNN mistakes can be quickly detected and properly dealt with in deployment, especially in settings like self-driving vehicles. Just as software engineering (SE) community has developed effective mechanisms and techniques to monitor and check programmed components, our previous work, SelfChecker, is designed to monitor and correct DNN predictions given unintended abnormal test data. SelfChecker triggers an alarm if the decisions given by the internal layer features of the model are inconsistent with the final prediction and provides advice in the form of an alternative prediction. In this paper, we extend SelfChecker to the security domain. Specifically, we describe SelfChecker++, which we designed to target both unintended abnormal test data and intended adversarial samples. Technically, we develop a technique which can transform any runtime inputs triggering alarms into semantically equivalent inputs, then we feed those transformed inputs to the model. Such runtime transformation nullifies any intended crafted samples, making the model immune to adversarial attacks that craft adversarial samples. We evaluated the alarm accuracy of SelfChecker++ on three DNN models and four popular image datasets, and found that SelfChecker++ triggers correct alarms on 63.10% of wrong DNN predictions, and triggers false alarms on 5.77% of correct DNN predictions. We also evaluated the effectiveness of SelfChecker++ in detecting adversarial examples and found it detects on average 70.09% of such samples with advice accuracy that is 20.89% higher than the original DNN model and 18.37% higher than SelfChecker.