Do independent directors tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth when they resign?
We examine the informativeness and credibility of independent directors’ stated resignation reasons. We posit that having access to private information, directors may resign in anticipation of weak future underperformance to limit damage to their reputation and further have an incentive to mask the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | BAR-HAVA, Keren, HUANG, Sterling, SEGAL, Benjamin, SEGAL, Dan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1727 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2754/viewcontent/0148558x18780801.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Do Outside Directors Tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth When They Resign?
by: BAR-HAVA, Keren, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Do Outside Directors Tell the Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth when They Resign
by: BAR-HAVA, Keren, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Do Outside Directors Tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth When They Resign?
by: HUANG, Sterling Zhenrui, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Consequences to directors of shareholder activism
by: SHIN, Sa-Pyung Sean, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Are Online Reviews Just Noise? The Truth, the Whole Truth, or Only the Partial Truth?
by: HU, Nan, et al.
Published: (2009)