Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence

Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen j...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HUANG, Fali, CAPPELLI, Peter
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/895
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1894/viewcontent/ScreenNBER032006.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1894
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-18942019-04-27T11:01:59Z Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence HUANG, Fali CAPPELLI, Peter Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen job candidates to find workers with a stronger work ethic who require less monitoring. This should be especially useful in work systems where monitoring by supervisors is more difficult, such as teamwork systems. We analyze the relationship between screening and monitoring in the context of a principal-agent model and test the theoretical results using a national sample of U.S. establishments, which includes information on employee selection. We find that employers screen applicants more intensively for work ethic where they make greater use of systems such as teamwork where monitoring is more difficult. This screening is also associated with higher productivity and higher wages and benefits, as predicted by the theory: The synergies between reduced monitoring costs and high performance work systems enable the firm to pay higher wages to attract and retain such workers. Screening for other attributes, such as cognitive ability, does not produce these results. 2006-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/895 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1894/viewcontent/ScreenNBER032006.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Labor Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Labor Economics
spellingShingle Labor Economics
HUANG, Fali
CAPPELLI, Peter
Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
description Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen job candidates to find workers with a stronger work ethic who require less monitoring. This should be especially useful in work systems where monitoring by supervisors is more difficult, such as teamwork systems. We analyze the relationship between screening and monitoring in the context of a principal-agent model and test the theoretical results using a national sample of U.S. establishments, which includes information on employee selection. We find that employers screen applicants more intensively for work ethic where they make greater use of systems such as teamwork where monitoring is more difficult. This screening is also associated with higher productivity and higher wages and benefits, as predicted by the theory: The synergies between reduced monitoring costs and high performance work systems enable the firm to pay higher wages to attract and retain such workers. Screening for other attributes, such as cognitive ability, does not produce these results.
format text
author HUANG, Fali
CAPPELLI, Peter
author_facet HUANG, Fali
CAPPELLI, Peter
author_sort HUANG, Fali
title Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
title_short Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
title_full Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
title_fullStr Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
title_sort employee screening: theory and evidence
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2006
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/895
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1894/viewcontent/ScreenNBER032006.pdf
_version_ 1770569332251688960