Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen j...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/895 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1894/viewcontent/ScreenNBER032006.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1894 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-18942019-04-27T11:01:59Z Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence HUANG, Fali CAPPELLI, Peter Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen job candidates to find workers with a stronger work ethic who require less monitoring. This should be especially useful in work systems where monitoring by supervisors is more difficult, such as teamwork systems. We analyze the relationship between screening and monitoring in the context of a principal-agent model and test the theoretical results using a national sample of U.S. establishments, which includes information on employee selection. We find that employers screen applicants more intensively for work ethic where they make greater use of systems such as teamwork where monitoring is more difficult. This screening is also associated with higher productivity and higher wages and benefits, as predicted by the theory: The synergies between reduced monitoring costs and high performance work systems enable the firm to pay higher wages to attract and retain such workers. Screening for other attributes, such as cognitive ability, does not produce these results. 2006-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/895 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1894/viewcontent/ScreenNBER032006.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Labor Economics |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Labor Economics |
spellingShingle |
Labor Economics HUANG, Fali CAPPELLI, Peter Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence |
description |
Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen job candidates to find workers with a stronger work ethic who require less monitoring. This should be especially useful in work systems where monitoring by supervisors is more difficult, such as teamwork systems. We analyze the relationship between screening and monitoring in the context of a principal-agent model and test the theoretical results using a national sample of U.S. establishments, which includes information on employee selection. We find that employers screen applicants more intensively for work ethic where they make greater use of systems such as teamwork where monitoring is more difficult. This screening is also associated with higher productivity and higher wages and benefits, as predicted by the theory: The synergies between reduced monitoring costs and high performance work systems enable the firm to pay higher wages to attract and retain such workers. Screening for other attributes, such as cognitive ability, does not produce these results. |
format |
text |
author |
HUANG, Fali CAPPELLI, Peter |
author_facet |
HUANG, Fali CAPPELLI, Peter |
author_sort |
HUANG, Fali |
title |
Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence |
title_short |
Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence |
title_full |
Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence |
title_fullStr |
Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence |
title_sort |
employee screening: theory and evidence |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/895 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1894/viewcontent/ScreenNBER032006.pdf |
_version_ |
1770569332251688960 |