Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments

Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming increasingly popular. The main purpose of NI trials is to assert the efficacy of a new treatment compared with an active control by demonstrating that the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the control. Most of the stati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KWONG, Koon Shing, CHEUNG, Siu Hung, HAYTER, Anthony J., WEN, Minn-Jye
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1411
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5467
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2410
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-24102018-05-11T07:37:27Z Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments KWONG, Koon Shing CHEUNG, Siu Hung HAYTER, Anthony J. WEN, Minn-Jye Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming increasingly popular. The main purpose of NI trials is to assert the efficacy of a new treatment compared with an active control by demonstrating that the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the control. Most of the statistical testing procedures in this area have been developed for three-arm NI trials in which a new treatment is compared with an active control in the presence of a placebo. However, NI trials frequently involve comparisons of several new treatments with a control, such as in studies involving different doses of a new drug or different combinations of several new drugs. In seeking an adequate testing procedure for such cases, we use a new approach that modifies existing testing procedures to cover circumstances in which several new treatments are present. We also give methods and algorithms to produce the optimal sample size configuration. In addition, we also discuss the advantages of using different margins for the assay sensitivity test between the active control and the placebo and the NI test between the new treatments and the active control. We illustrate the new approach by using data from a clinical trial. 2012-10-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1411 info:doi/10.1002/sim.5467 https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5467 Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University three-arm design non-inferiority trial control treatment placebo familywise error rate assay sensitivity pre-specified non-inferiority margin Econometrics Health Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic three-arm design
non-inferiority trial
control treatment
placebo
familywise error rate
assay sensitivity
pre-specified non-inferiority margin
Econometrics
Health Economics
spellingShingle three-arm design
non-inferiority trial
control treatment
placebo
familywise error rate
assay sensitivity
pre-specified non-inferiority margin
Econometrics
Health Economics
KWONG, Koon Shing
CHEUNG, Siu Hung
HAYTER, Anthony J.
WEN, Minn-Jye
Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments
description Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming increasingly popular. The main purpose of NI trials is to assert the efficacy of a new treatment compared with an active control by demonstrating that the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the control. Most of the statistical testing procedures in this area have been developed for three-arm NI trials in which a new treatment is compared with an active control in the presence of a placebo. However, NI trials frequently involve comparisons of several new treatments with a control, such as in studies involving different doses of a new drug or different combinations of several new drugs. In seeking an adequate testing procedure for such cases, we use a new approach that modifies existing testing procedures to cover circumstances in which several new treatments are present. We also give methods and algorithms to produce the optimal sample size configuration. In addition, we also discuss the advantages of using different margins for the assay sensitivity test between the active control and the placebo and the NI test between the new treatments and the active control. We illustrate the new approach by using data from a clinical trial.
format text
author KWONG, Koon Shing
CHEUNG, Siu Hung
HAYTER, Anthony J.
WEN, Minn-Jye
author_facet KWONG, Koon Shing
CHEUNG, Siu Hung
HAYTER, Anthony J.
WEN, Minn-Jye
author_sort KWONG, Koon Shing
title Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments
title_short Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments
title_full Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments
title_fullStr Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments
title_full_unstemmed Extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments
title_sort extension of three-arm non-inferiority studies to trials with multiple new treatments
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2012
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1411
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5467
_version_ 1770571362725789696