"Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime

I link the idea that greater state policing induces private neglect of safety precautions (moral hazard) with the concept of “inferior inputs” in the production function literature. I model crime prevention as an outcome of two “inputs”—policing (a public good) and private security expenses. I show...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: GUHA, Brishti
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1508
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-013-9408-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2507
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-25072015-08-21T03:44:03Z "Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime GUHA, Brishti I link the idea that greater state policing induces private neglect of safety precautions (moral hazard) with the concept of “inferior inputs” in the production function literature. I model crime prevention as an outcome of two “inputs”—policing (a public good) and private security expenses. I show that if cost-minimizing individuals choose insufficient private expenses to completely deter crimes, a rise in policing raises criminals’ probability of success if and only if policing is an “inferior input” in crime prevention. This is so even though the marginal productivity of policing is always positive, and works through a strong moral hazard effect. I discuss implications for policy-makers. 2015-02-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1508 info:doi/10.1007/s10657-013-9408-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-013-9408-x Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Policing Crime Moral hazard Inferior inputs Private precautions Public goods Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Policing
Crime
Moral hazard
Inferior inputs
Private precautions
Public goods
Economics
spellingShingle Policing
Crime
Moral hazard
Inferior inputs
Private precautions
Public goods
Economics
GUHA, Brishti
"Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime
description I link the idea that greater state policing induces private neglect of safety precautions (moral hazard) with the concept of “inferior inputs” in the production function literature. I model crime prevention as an outcome of two “inputs”—policing (a public good) and private security expenses. I show that if cost-minimizing individuals choose insufficient private expenses to completely deter crimes, a rise in policing raises criminals’ probability of success if and only if policing is an “inferior input” in crime prevention. This is so even though the marginal productivity of policing is always positive, and works through a strong moral hazard effect. I discuss implications for policy-makers.
format text
author GUHA, Brishti
author_facet GUHA, Brishti
author_sort GUHA, Brishti
title "Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime
title_short "Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime
title_full "Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime
title_fullStr "Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime
title_full_unstemmed "Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime
title_sort "inferiority" complex? policing, private precautions and crime
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1508
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-013-9408-x
_version_ 1770571605765783552