Meritocracy Voting: Measuring the Unmeasurable

Meritocracy Voting: Measuring the Unmeasurable

Learned societies commonly carry out selection processes to add new fellows to an existing fellowship. Criteria vary across societies but are typically based on subjective judgments concerning the merit of individuals who are nominated for fellowships. These subjective assessments may be made by exi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: PHILLIPS, Peter C. B.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
Subjects:
Auditing peer review
Bibliometric data
Election
Fellowship
Measurement
Meritocracy
Peer review
Quantification
Subjective assessment
Voting
Econometrics
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1842
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2841/viewcontent/MeritocracyVotingMeasuringUnmeasurable_2016.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English

Internet

https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1842
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2841/viewcontent/MeritocracyVotingMeasuringUnmeasurable_2016.pdf

Similar Items