Meritocracy Voting: Measuring the Unmeasurable
Learned societies commonly carry out selection processes to add new fellows to an existing fellowship. Criteria vary across societies but are typically based on subjective judgments concerning the merit of individuals who are nominated for fellowships. These subjective assessments may be made by exi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | PHILLIPS, Peter C. B. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1842 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2841/viewcontent/MeritocracyVotingMeasuringUnmeasurable_2016.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The student editorial board of methods of information in medicine - An opportunity to educate tomorrow's peer reviewers
by: Aronsky, D., et al.
Published: (2013) -
Adaptive P2P platform for data sharing
by: NG WEE SIONG
Published: (2010) -
Dynamic data consistency maintenance in peer-to-peer caching system
by: GAO SONG
Published: (2010) -
Open-Ended Questionnaire Regarding Voting Choices in Japan
by: Jennifer Dodgson
Published: (2019) -
Data management in peer-to-peer environment: A perspective of BestPeer
by: Zhou, A.Y., et al.
Published: (2013)