Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey

This paper studies a semi-parametric method for estimating the prevalence of a binary outcome using a two-phase survey. The motivation for a two-phase survey is, due to time, money and ethical considerations, it is impossible to carry out comprehensive evaluation on all subjects in a large random sa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LEUNG, Denis H. Y., QIN, J
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2088
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3088/viewcontent/semiparametric.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3088
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-30882017-09-13T04:18:15Z Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey LEUNG, Denis H. Y. QIN, J This paper studies a semi-parametric method for estimating the prevalence of a binary outcome using a two-phase survey. The motivation for a two-phase survey is, due to time, money and ethical considerations, it is impossible to carry out comprehensive evaluation on all subjects in a large random sample of the population. Rather, a relatively inexpensive "screening test" is given to all subjects in the random sample and only individuals more likely to have a positive outcome (cases) will be selected for a further "gold standard" test to verify the outcome. Therefore, individuals with verified outcome form a non-random sample from the population and care must be taken when the data are used for estimating the prevalence of the outcome. This paper proposes a semi-parametric method for estimating the outcome prevalence. It requires only an estimate of the probability of selection into the second phase, given the first phase data. This feature is desirable as in most cases, the probability of selection into the second phase is under the control of the researchers, and even when it is not, can be easily estimated given the data. The proposed method uses the empirical likelihood approach (Owen, 1988), which yields consistent prevalence estimates as long as the probability of selection into the second phase is correctly modeled. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2088 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3088/viewcontent/semiparametric.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Empiricial likelihood; missing data; surrogate; two-phase sampling Econometrics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Empiricial likelihood; missing data; surrogate; two-phase sampling
Econometrics
spellingShingle Empiricial likelihood; missing data; surrogate; two-phase sampling
Econometrics
LEUNG, Denis H. Y.
QIN, J
Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
description This paper studies a semi-parametric method for estimating the prevalence of a binary outcome using a two-phase survey. The motivation for a two-phase survey is, due to time, money and ethical considerations, it is impossible to carry out comprehensive evaluation on all subjects in a large random sample of the population. Rather, a relatively inexpensive "screening test" is given to all subjects in the random sample and only individuals more likely to have a positive outcome (cases) will be selected for a further "gold standard" test to verify the outcome. Therefore, individuals with verified outcome form a non-random sample from the population and care must be taken when the data are used for estimating the prevalence of the outcome. This paper proposes a semi-parametric method for estimating the outcome prevalence. It requires only an estimate of the probability of selection into the second phase, given the first phase data. This feature is desirable as in most cases, the probability of selection into the second phase is under the control of the researchers, and even when it is not, can be easily estimated given the data. The proposed method uses the empirical likelihood approach (Owen, 1988), which yields consistent prevalence estimates as long as the probability of selection into the second phase is correctly modeled.
format text
author LEUNG, Denis H. Y.
QIN, J
author_facet LEUNG, Denis H. Y.
QIN, J
author_sort LEUNG, Denis H. Y.
title Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
title_short Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
title_full Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
title_fullStr Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
title_full_unstemmed Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
title_sort semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2088
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3088/viewcontent/semiparametric.pdf
_version_ 1770573684915830784