Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey
This paper studies a semi-parametric method for estimating the prevalence of a binary outcome using a two-phase survey. The motivation for a two-phase survey is, due to time, money and ethical considerations, it is impossible to carry out comprehensive evaluation on all subjects in a large random sa...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2088 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3088/viewcontent/semiparametric.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3088 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-30882017-09-13T04:18:15Z Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey LEUNG, Denis H. Y. QIN, J This paper studies a semi-parametric method for estimating the prevalence of a binary outcome using a two-phase survey. The motivation for a two-phase survey is, due to time, money and ethical considerations, it is impossible to carry out comprehensive evaluation on all subjects in a large random sample of the population. Rather, a relatively inexpensive "screening test" is given to all subjects in the random sample and only individuals more likely to have a positive outcome (cases) will be selected for a further "gold standard" test to verify the outcome. Therefore, individuals with verified outcome form a non-random sample from the population and care must be taken when the data are used for estimating the prevalence of the outcome. This paper proposes a semi-parametric method for estimating the outcome prevalence. It requires only an estimate of the probability of selection into the second phase, given the first phase data. This feature is desirable as in most cases, the probability of selection into the second phase is under the control of the researchers, and even when it is not, can be easily estimated given the data. The proposed method uses the empirical likelihood approach (Owen, 1988), which yields consistent prevalence estimates as long as the probability of selection into the second phase is correctly modeled. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2088 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3088/viewcontent/semiparametric.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Empiricial likelihood; missing data; surrogate; two-phase sampling Econometrics |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Empiricial likelihood; missing data; surrogate; two-phase sampling Econometrics |
spellingShingle |
Empiricial likelihood; missing data; surrogate; two-phase sampling Econometrics LEUNG, Denis H. Y. QIN, J Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey |
description |
This paper studies a semi-parametric method for estimating the prevalence of a binary outcome using a two-phase survey. The motivation for a two-phase survey is, due to time, money and ethical considerations, it is impossible to carry out comprehensive evaluation on all subjects in a large random sample of the population. Rather, a relatively inexpensive "screening test" is given to all subjects in the random sample and only individuals more likely to have a positive outcome (cases) will be selected for a further "gold standard" test to verify the outcome. Therefore, individuals with verified outcome form a non-random sample from the population and care must be taken when the data are used for estimating the prevalence of the outcome. This paper proposes a semi-parametric method for estimating the outcome prevalence. It requires only an estimate of the probability of selection into the second phase, given the first phase data. This feature is desirable as in most cases, the probability of selection into the second phase is under the control of the researchers, and even when it is not, can be easily estimated given the data. The proposed method uses the empirical likelihood approach (Owen, 1988), which yields consistent prevalence estimates as long as the probability of selection into the second phase is correctly modeled. |
format |
text |
author |
LEUNG, Denis H. Y. QIN, J |
author_facet |
LEUNG, Denis H. Y. QIN, J |
author_sort |
LEUNG, Denis H. Y. |
title |
Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey |
title_short |
Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey |
title_full |
Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey |
title_fullStr |
Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey |
title_sort |
semiparametric prevalence estimation from a two-phase survey |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2088 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3088/viewcontent/semiparametric.pdf |
_version_ |
1770573684915830784 |