The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing

Historically, based on the premise that trademark protection is about consumer welfare, trademark law has allowed trademark licensing only as long as licensors control the quality of the products bearing the licensed marks. Ever since its adoption, however, this rule has been difficult to enforce be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CALBOLI, Irene
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1718
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3670/viewcontent/P_ID_53240_LRAMU_Trademark_Licensing.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3670
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-36702017-04-17T09:21:13Z The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing CALBOLI, Irene Historically, based on the premise that trademark protection is about consumer welfare, trademark law has allowed trademark licensing only as long as licensors control the quality of the products bearing the licensed marks. Ever since its adoption, however, this rule has been difficult to enforce because it hinges on a concept that is ambiguous and difficult to frame in a legal context: quality control. Unsurprisingly, the consequence has been inconsistent case law and much uncertainty as to what represents valid licensing. In addition, in the past decades, courts have proven increasingly reticent to strictly apply this rule and have declared agreements with minimal or no control valid as long as the public was not misled. The rise of recent practices such as, inter alia, promotional trademark licensing has contributed to this trend and highlighted the growing unsustainability of the current requirement in today's economy. This Article argues against this uncertainty and advocates for an amendment to the current rule that would allow licensing with or without control. In support of this change, this Article offers evidence that, contrary to the original intention of the law, this rule is negatively affecting competition in the marketplace and allowing unfair competitors to initiate frivolous legal actions. This Article therefore proposes that, rather than focusing on an increasingly sterile and confusing requirement - quality control - the courts should assess the validity of licensing by focusing directly on the result of the agreements - whether the use of the licensed marks will deceive consumers. 2007-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1718 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3670/viewcontent/P_ID_53240_LRAMU_Trademark_Licensing.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Trademark Licensing Quality Control Intellectual Property Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Trademark
Licensing
Quality Control
Intellectual Property Law
spellingShingle Trademark
Licensing
Quality Control
Intellectual Property Law
CALBOLI, Irene
The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing
description Historically, based on the premise that trademark protection is about consumer welfare, trademark law has allowed trademark licensing only as long as licensors control the quality of the products bearing the licensed marks. Ever since its adoption, however, this rule has been difficult to enforce because it hinges on a concept that is ambiguous and difficult to frame in a legal context: quality control. Unsurprisingly, the consequence has been inconsistent case law and much uncertainty as to what represents valid licensing. In addition, in the past decades, courts have proven increasingly reticent to strictly apply this rule and have declared agreements with minimal or no control valid as long as the public was not misled. The rise of recent practices such as, inter alia, promotional trademark licensing has contributed to this trend and highlighted the growing unsustainability of the current requirement in today's economy. This Article argues against this uncertainty and advocates for an amendment to the current rule that would allow licensing with or without control. In support of this change, this Article offers evidence that, contrary to the original intention of the law, this rule is negatively affecting competition in the marketplace and allowing unfair competitors to initiate frivolous legal actions. This Article therefore proposes that, rather than focusing on an increasingly sterile and confusing requirement - quality control - the courts should assess the validity of licensing by focusing directly on the result of the agreements - whether the use of the licensed marks will deceive consumers.
format text
author CALBOLI, Irene
author_facet CALBOLI, Irene
author_sort CALBOLI, Irene
title The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing
title_short The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing
title_full The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing
title_fullStr The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing
title_full_unstemmed The Sunset of "Quality Control" in Modern Trademark Licensing
title_sort sunset of "quality control" in modern trademark licensing
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2007
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1718
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3670/viewcontent/P_ID_53240_LRAMU_Trademark_Licensing.pdf
_version_ 1772829759628115968