The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; s...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1754 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; statements are excluded only if they are likely to be unreliable. This article questions the desirability of adopting a similar position in Singapore. It examines the jurisprudential basis of the voluntariness concept, the alleged defects of the concept and the applicability of the English and Australian reforms to Singapore. The article concludes that the reliability test should not be adopted because of potential negative ramifications. |
|---|