The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions

The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1754
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3706
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-37062016-09-23T01:36:12Z The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; statements are excluded only if they are likely to be unreliable. This article questions the desirability of adopting a similar position in Singapore. It examines the jurisprudential basis of the voluntariness concept, the alleged defects of the concept and the applicability of the English and Australian reforms to Singapore. The article concludes that the reliability test should not be adopted because of potential negative ramifications. 2005-09-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1754 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Criminal procedure Evidence (Law) Criminal Evidence Criminal Procedure Evidence
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Criminal procedure
Evidence (Law)
Criminal Evidence
Criminal Procedure
Evidence
spellingShingle Criminal procedure
Evidence (Law)
Criminal Evidence
Criminal Procedure
Evidence
QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
description The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; statements are excluded only if they are likely to be unreliable. This article questions the desirability of adopting a similar position in Singapore. It examines the jurisprudential basis of the voluntariness concept, the alleged defects of the concept and the applicability of the English and Australian reforms to Singapore. The article concludes that the reliability test should not be adopted because of potential negative ramifications.
format text
author QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
author_facet QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
author_sort QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
title The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
title_short The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
title_full The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
title_fullStr The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
title_full_unstemmed The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
title_sort concept of voluntariness in the law of confessions
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2005
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1754
_version_ 1772829875483181056