The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions
The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1754 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3706 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-37062016-09-23T01:36:12Z The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; statements are excluded only if they are likely to be unreliable. This article questions the desirability of adopting a similar position in Singapore. It examines the jurisprudential basis of the voluntariness concept, the alleged defects of the concept and the applicability of the English and Australian reforms to Singapore. The article concludes that the reliability test should not be adopted because of potential negative ramifications. 2005-09-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1754 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Criminal procedure Evidence (Law) Criminal Evidence Criminal Procedure Evidence |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Criminal procedure Evidence (Law) Criminal Evidence Criminal Procedure Evidence |
spellingShingle |
Criminal procedure Evidence (Law) Criminal Evidence Criminal Procedure Evidence QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions |
description |
The common law principle, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence unless it is a voluntary statement, is enshrined in s 122(5) of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code. Both the UK and Australia have abandoned this principle and replaced it with a "reliability test"; statements are excluded only if they are likely to be unreliable. This article questions the desirability of adopting a similar position in Singapore. It examines the jurisprudential basis of the voluntariness concept, the alleged defects of the concept and the applicability of the English and Australian reforms to Singapore. The article concludes that the reliability test should not be adopted because of potential negative ramifications. |
format |
text |
author |
QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas |
author_facet |
QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas |
author_sort |
QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas |
title |
The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions |
title_short |
The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions |
title_full |
The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions |
title_fullStr |
The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Concept of Voluntariness in the Law of Confessions |
title_sort |
concept of voluntariness in the law of confessions |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1754 |
_version_ |
1772829875483181056 |