The Judicial Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives from an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction
Stephen’s ground-breaking Indian Evidence Act contained ideas that appear unfamiliar in the context of modern rules of evidence. Singapore is an Indian Evidence Act jurisdiction which has retained those ideas, such as the non-distinction between relevance and admissibility, the framing of exclusiona...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1977 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3929/viewcontent/JudicialDiscretionExcludeRelevantEvidence_2012.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Redefining Relevancy and Exclusionary Discretion in Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872: The Singapore Experiment and Lessons for Other Indian Evidence Act Jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2014) -
The Future of the Similar Fact Rule in an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction: Singapore
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013) -
Re-aligning legal professional privilege in Indian Evidence Act jurisdictions with modern practice
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2022) -
The Indian Evidence Act and recent formulations of the exclusionary discretion in Singapore: Not quite different rivers into the same sea
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Re-assessing the evidentiary regime of the International Court of Justice: A case for codifying its discretion to exclude evidence
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2015)