Reliability and Relevance as the Touchstones for Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Muhammad bin Kadar v PP [2011] 3 SLR 1205 [Case Note]
The Court of Appeal in Muhammad bin Kadar v PP [2011] 3 SLR 1205 (“Kadar”) formally recognised the judicial discretion to exclude evidence as an integral part of the law on criminal evidence in Singapore. This discretion, the court held, would help ensure that all evidence coming before the court wo...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1979 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3931/viewcontent/ReliabilityRelevanceTouchstonesAdmissibility_2012_SALJ.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The Prosecution's Duty of Disclosure in Singapore: Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor [2011] 3 SLR 1205
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2011) -
Improperly obtained evidence in criminal proceedings: An updated framework
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Evidence and Criminal Procedure
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013) -
Evidence and Criminal Procedure: Gradual Developments Towards Clarity in a Maze of Statutory Enactments
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2015) -
Recent developments concerning similar fact evidence in Singapore: Pushing the boundaries of admissibility – PP v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh [2017] 3 SLR 66; Micheal Anak Garing v PP [2017] 1 SLR 748
by: CHUA, Eunice
Published: (2018)