Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan

This article analyses the results of 322 lawsuits regarding retail mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan between 2000 and 2012 and their relationship with other factors such as investors’ personal characteristics, main arguments and causes of action. This article has the following major findin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHEN, Christopher C. H.
Format: text
Language:Chinese
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2322
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4274/viewcontent/2015_____________preprint_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: Chinese
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4274
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-42742017-10-30T06:31:52Z Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan CHEN, Christopher C. H. This article analyses the results of 322 lawsuits regarding retail mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan between 2000 and 2012 and their relationship with other factors such as investors’ personal characteristics, main arguments and causes of action. This article has the following major findings: (1) the winning rate for investors was quite low, meaning that banks face low legal risk from misselling claims; (2) investors were not better off by filing a complaint to the Banker’s Association; (3) we have not proved the courts showing preference for investors with certain personal traits due to limited information available; (4) a plaintiff’s winning rate does not vary much from one argument to another, except for arguing formation of contract, but our research shows that more might have to be done to clarify post-contractual duty of banks; (5) there is also no proof showing that certain causes of action or litigation strategies would help investors winning a judgment and we have not proved that filing more causes of action would help to increate a plaintiff’s chance of winning. Our findings worth regulators and legislators to reconsider regulatory policies for investor protection as well as dispute resolution for financial consumers in the future to offer more complete protection of financial consumers. 2015-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2322 info:doi/10.3966/102398202015060141003 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4274/viewcontent/2015_____________preprint_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law chi Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Empirical study legal risk investment disputes retail investment products mutual fund structured note trust bank financial consumer protection Taiwan Legal Studies Regional Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language Chinese
topic Empirical study
legal risk
investment disputes
retail investment products
mutual fund
structured note
trust
bank
financial consumer protection
Taiwan
Legal Studies
Regional Economics
spellingShingle Empirical study
legal risk
investment disputes
retail investment products
mutual fund
structured note
trust
bank
financial consumer protection
Taiwan
Legal Studies
Regional Economics
CHEN, Christopher C. H.
Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan
description This article analyses the results of 322 lawsuits regarding retail mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan between 2000 and 2012 and their relationship with other factors such as investors’ personal characteristics, main arguments and causes of action. This article has the following major findings: (1) the winning rate for investors was quite low, meaning that banks face low legal risk from misselling claims; (2) investors were not better off by filing a complaint to the Banker’s Association; (3) we have not proved the courts showing preference for investors with certain personal traits due to limited information available; (4) a plaintiff’s winning rate does not vary much from one argument to another, except for arguing formation of contract, but our research shows that more might have to be done to clarify post-contractual duty of banks; (5) there is also no proof showing that certain causes of action or litigation strategies would help investors winning a judgment and we have not proved that filing more causes of action would help to increate a plaintiff’s chance of winning. Our findings worth regulators and legislators to reconsider regulatory policies for investor protection as well as dispute resolution for financial consumers in the future to offer more complete protection of financial consumers.
format text
author CHEN, Christopher C. H.
author_facet CHEN, Christopher C. H.
author_sort CHEN, Christopher C. H.
title Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan
title_short Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan
title_full Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan
title_fullStr Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: An empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan
title_sort legal risk and investor protection for retail investment products: an empirical study of lawsuits regarding mutual funds and structured notes in taiwan
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2322
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4274/viewcontent/2015_____________preprint_.pdf
_version_ 1772829683291783168