Three “pitfalls” for the unwary: Third-party funding in Asia
For some time, practitioners would have seen news alerts headlining that third-party funding is permitted in Singapore and Hong Kong for arbitration and arbitration-related court proceedings. Digging a little deeper beyond the shiny new labels, this article highlights three practical “pitfalls” whic...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHAN, Darius |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3040 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4998/viewcontent/Three__Pitfalls__for_the_Unwary__Third_Party_Funding_in_Asia___The_Singapore_Law_Gazette__1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Options available to an unsuccessful party in an arbitration
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2011) -
Tracing and Three Party Restitution
by: YEO, Tiong Min
Published: (1993) -
Determining the parties’ true choice of the seat of arbitration and lex arbitri
by: HWANG, Michael, et al.
Published: (2010) -
New in-roads to enhance Singapore’s competitiveness as the preferred arbitration seat in Asia
by: LYE, KC, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Singapore: A Dallah for South-East Asia?
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2012)