To boycott proceedings or not? Recourse against arbitral awards on jurisdictional grounds by different categories of respondents under the Model Law
The remedies that award debtors have under Articles 16(3), 34 and 36 of the Model Law, and more critically the inter-relationship between those remedies, has attracted much debate. Yet there is a dearth of analysis on how the availability of each remedy may differ according to the award debtor’s deg...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | CHAN, Darius, NEOH, Claire |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3201 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5159/viewcontent/aiaa029.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Recourse against an international arbitration award made in Singapore
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2012) -
The scope of ‘de novo’ review of an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2015) -
Waiver of review of arbitration awards
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2012) -
Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2011) -
Securing natural justice in arbitration proceedings
by: PULLE, Austin Ignatius
Published: (2012)