Michelin II or the regulatory robustness rating: Part 2
In this post on the Kluwer Mediation Blog, the thinking, assumptions, and value judgments underpinning the 12 criteria of the Regulatory Robustness Rating for mediation jurisdictions System is explained.
Saved in:
Main Author: | ALEXANDER, Nadja |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3316 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5274/viewcontent/SSRN_id3749834.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Regulatory Robustness Rating (RRR): A Michelin guide to mediation regulatory regimes
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja
Published: (2016) -
The regulatory robustness rating in practice: Part 3
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Introducing regulatory robustness ratings for mediation regimes
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja
Published: (2017) -
EU mediation law handbook: Regulatory robustness ratings for mediation regimes
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Aesthetics in negotiation: Part two: The uses of alchemy
by: LeBaron, Michelle, et al.
Published: (2017)