Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?

In the past years, several companies, such as Google, Linkedin, Facebook, and Alibaba, went public with dual-class share structures, that is, share structures that typically include two classes of ordinary shares carrying unequal voting rights. Those shares with more voting rights (eg, ‘class A’ sha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3702
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5660/viewcontent/should_securities.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5660
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-56602022-02-08T01:41:55Z Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares? Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ, In the past years, several companies, such as Google, Linkedin, Facebook, and Alibaba, went public with dual-class share structures, that is, share structures that typically include two classes of ordinary shares carrying unequal voting rights. Those shares with more voting rights (eg, ‘class A’ shares) are usually held by the company´s founders and executives, while the rest of the company´s share capital, formed by stock with regular voting rights (eg, ‘class B’ shares), is generally sold to outside investors. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3702 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5660/viewcontent/should_securities.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Comparative law Dual-class shares Voting rights Business Organizations Law Comparative and Foreign Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Comparative law
Dual-class shares
Voting rights
Business Organizations Law
Comparative and Foreign Law
spellingShingle Comparative law
Dual-class shares
Voting rights
Business Organizations Law
Comparative and Foreign Law
Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ,
Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
description In the past years, several companies, such as Google, Linkedin, Facebook, and Alibaba, went public with dual-class share structures, that is, share structures that typically include two classes of ordinary shares carrying unequal voting rights. Those shares with more voting rights (eg, ‘class A’ shares) are usually held by the company´s founders and executives, while the rest of the company´s share capital, formed by stock with regular voting rights (eg, ‘class B’ shares), is generally sold to outside investors.
format text
author Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ,
author_facet Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ,
author_sort Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ,
title Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
title_short Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
title_full Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
title_fullStr Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
title_full_unstemmed Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
title_sort should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3702
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5660/viewcontent/should_securities.pdf
_version_ 1770576125892755456