Should securities regulators allow companies going public with dual-class shares?
In the past years, several companies, such as Google, Linkedin, Facebook, and Alibaba, went public with dual-class share structures, that is, share structures that typically include two classes of ordinary shares carrying unequal voting rights. Those shares with more voting rights (eg, ‘class A’ sha...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3702 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5660/viewcontent/should_securities.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The (re)introduction of dual-class share structures in Hong Kong: a historical and comparative analysis
by: HUANG, Hui Robin, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Re-examining the business judgment rule from a comparative perspective: Is it really in the shareholders’ interests?
by: Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ,
Published: (2016) -
Theory, evidence, and policy on dual-class shares: A country-specific response to a global debate
by: Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ,
Published: (2021) -
Theory, evidence and policy on dual-class shares: A country-specific response to a global debate
by: Aurelio GURREA-MARTINEZ,
Published: (2019) -
Chapter on Philippine Sports Law
by: Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
Published: (2020)