Expert Evidence and the Ultimate Issue Rule
Typically, witnesses can only testify as to what they directly perceived, and cannot express their inferences. Exceptions exist somewhat for experts, but sometimes they render opinions that go to the very issues only the court can adjudicate upon, which the ultimate issue rule theoretically forbids....
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/21 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=sol_research_smu |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
A Common Law View of Causation, Science and Statistical Evidence in the Courtroom
by: BITAS, Basil C.
Published: (2011) -
The 2012 Amendments to Singapore's Evidence Act: More Questions than Answers as Regards Expert Opionion Evidence?
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013) -
Expert Evidence: Rethinking our Conventional Paradigms?
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2014) -
The impact of the rules of court 2021 on the law of evidence
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2022) -
The Future of the Similar Fact Rule in an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction: Singapore
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013)