Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process

The Supreme Court Practice Directions were amended in January to introduce severalchanges concerning the use of AlternativeDispute Resolution (ADR) in resolving SupremeCourt civil cases.1 These amendments represent a significant shift in the Judiciary’sencouragementofthelegalprofessiontoroutinely co...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
Format:	text
Language:	English
Published:	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
Subjects:	ADR Supreme Court Practice Directions ADR Offer Civil Law Courts
Online Access:	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/85 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=sol_research_smu
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	Singapore Management University
Language:	English

id	sg-smu-ink.sol_research_smu-1084
record_format	dspace
spelling	sg-smu-ink.sol_research_smu-10842017-11-16T07:29:05Z Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas The Supreme Court Practice Directions were amended in January to introduce severalchanges concerning the use of AlternativeDispute Resolution (ADR) in resolving SupremeCourt civil cases.1 These amendments represent a significant shift in the Judiciary’sencouragementofthelegalprofessiontoroutinely consider theuseofADR 2016-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/85 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=sol_research_smu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Law (SMU Access Only) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University ADR Supreme Court Practice Directions ADR Offer Civil Law Courts
institution	Singapore Management University
building	SMU Libraries
country	Singapore
collection	InK@SMU
language	English
topic	ADR Supreme Court Practice Directions ADR Offer Civil Law Courts
spellingShingle	ADR Supreme Court Practice Directions ADR Offer Civil Law Courts QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process
description	The Supreme Court Practice Directions were amended in January to introduce severalchanges concerning the use of AlternativeDispute Resolution (ADR) in resolving SupremeCourt civil cases.1 These amendments represent a significant shift in the Judiciary’sencouragementofthelegalprofessiontoroutinely consider theuseofADR
format	text
author	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
author_facet	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
author_sort	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
title	Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process
title_short	Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process
title_full	Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process
title_fullStr	Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process
title_full_unstemmed	Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process
title_sort	supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): a significant step in further incorporating adr into the civil justice process
publisher	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate	2016
url	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/85 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=sol_research_smu
_version_	1681132605854973952

Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process

Similar Items