Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process
The Supreme Court Practice Directions were amended in January to introduce severalchanges concerning the use of AlternativeDispute Resolution (ADR) in resolving SupremeCourt civil cases.1 These amendments represent a significant shift in the Judiciary’sencouragementofthelegalprofessiontoroutinely co...
Saved in:
Main Author: | QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/85 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=sol_research_smu |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Introducing a ‘presumption of ADR’ for civil matters in the Subordinate Courts
by: LOW, Joyce, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Finding the appropriate mode of dispute resolution: Introducing neutral evaluation in the Subordinate Courts
by: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Powers of the Supreme Court
by: La Viña, Antonio Gabriel M.
Published: (2022) -
Counting the Cost of Enlarging the Role of ADR in Civil Justice
by: Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON,
Published: (2022) -
So ordered: A genre-based analysis of concession in Supreme Court decision in the Philippines
by: Balgos, Anne Richie G.
Published: (2013)