Exploding the myth that sub-trustees 'drop out'
Despite judicial statements to the contrary, there remains doubt as to whether bare sub-trustees 'drop out' so as to render a principal trustee to come under a 'direct' trustee-beneficiary relationship with the sub-beneficiary. Although such a result is contrary to principle, it...
Saved in:
Main Author: | THAM, Chee Ho |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/86 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Trustees’ investment duties and cryptoassets
by: TANG, Hang Wu
Published: (2020) -
The "trustee exception" in Lloyd's v Harper: Loss, liability and "black holes"
by: THAM, Chee Ho
Published: (2016) -
Reform of Certain Aspects of the Trustees Act
by: WAN, Wai Yee, et al.
Published: (2003) -
TRUSTEES' INVESTMENT POWERS IN RELATION TO PROPERTY
by: CHAN PEY LING
Published: (2020) -
Transferor's intention, trustee's undertaking and the scope of fiduciary liability
by: SEE, Alvin W. L.
Published: (2018)