Generalization and induction: Misconceptions, clarifications and a classification of induction
In “Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research,” Lee and Baskerville (2003) try to clarify generalization and classify it into four types. Unfortunately, their account is problematic. We propose repairs. Central among these is our balance-of-evidence argument that we should adopt...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | TSANG, Eric W. K., WILLIAMS, John N. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1142 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2398/viewcontent/TsangWilliams_GeneralizationInduction_MISQ_2012.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Generalization and Hume's Problem of Induction: Misconceptions and Clarifications
by: TSANG, Eric W. K., et al.
Published: (2007) -
Generalization and Induction: More Misconceptions and Clarifications
by: TSANG, Eric W. K., et al.
Published: (2012) -
Classifying Generalization: Paradigm War or Abuse of Terminology?
by: WILLIAMS, John N., et al.
Published: (2015) -
Justifying the norms of inductive inference
by: Vassend, Olav B.
Published: (2022) -
Topology selection and efficiency improvement of inductive power links
by: Jegadeesan, R., et al.
Published: (2014)