There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke
Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, anoriginal counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis ofpropositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Theirargument fails to nullify Backward Clock whichalso shows...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2009 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3266/viewcontent/9173235.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3266 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-32662017-04-13T02:26:38Z There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke WILLIAMS, John N. Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, anoriginal counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis ofpropositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Theirargument fails to nullify Backward Clock whichalso shows that other tracking analyses, such as Dretske’s and one that Adams et al may well have in mind, are inadequate. 2016-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2009 info:doi/10.5840/logos-episteme20167334 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3266/viewcontent/9173235.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Truth-tracking Sensitive belief Methods Nozick Dretske Epistemology Philosophy |
| institution |
Singapore Management University |
| building |
SMU Libraries |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Singapore Singapore |
| content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
| collection |
InK@SMU |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Truth-tracking Sensitive belief Methods Nozick Dretske Epistemology Philosophy |
| spellingShingle |
Truth-tracking Sensitive belief Methods Nozick Dretske Epistemology Philosophy WILLIAMS, John N. There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke |
| description |
Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, anoriginal counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis ofpropositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Theirargument fails to nullify Backward Clock whichalso shows that other tracking analyses, such as Dretske’s and one that Adams et al may well have in mind, are inadequate. |
| format |
text |
| author |
WILLIAMS, John N. |
| author_facet |
WILLIAMS, John N. |
| author_sort |
WILLIAMS, John N. |
| title |
There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke |
| title_short |
There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke |
| title_full |
There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke |
| title_fullStr |
There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke |
| title_full_unstemmed |
There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke |
| title_sort |
there’s nothing to beat a backward clock: a rejoinder to adams, barker and clarke |
| publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2009 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3266/viewcontent/9173235.pdf |
| _version_ |
1770573099552473088 |