There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke
Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, anoriginal counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis ofpropositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Theirargument fails to nullify Backward Clock whichalso shows...
Saved in:
Main Author: | WILLIAMS, John N. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2009 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3266/viewcontent/9173235.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Still stuck on the Backward Clock: A rejoinder to Clarke, Adams and Barker
by: WILLIAMS, John Nicholas
Published: (2017) -
The Backward Clock, truth-tracking, and safety
by: WILLIAMS, John N., et al.
Published: (2015) -
Law and epistemology: An account of judgement
by: MI, Chienkuo, et al.
Published: (2021) -
On epistemological traditions, truths and proverbial frogs
by: Montemar, Louie C.
Published: (2006) -
In Defence of an Argument for Evans's Principle: A Rejoinder to Vahid
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2006)