Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample
The positive affect and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is a popular measure of positive (PA) and negative affectivity (NA). Developed and validated in Western contexts, the 20-item scale has been frequently administered on respondents from Asian countries with the assumption of cross-cultural meas...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3041 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4298/viewcontent/Examining_the_cross.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4298 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-42982021-11-25T05:11:33Z Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample LEE, Sean Teck Hao HARTANTO, Andree YONG, Jose C. KOH, Brandon LEUNG, Angela K. Y. The positive affect and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is a popular measure of positive (PA) and negative affectivity (NA). Developed and validated in Western contexts, the 20-item scale has been frequently administered on respondents from Asian countries with the assumption of cross-cultural measurement invariance. We examine this assumption via a rigorous multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, which allows us to assess between-group differences in both strength of scale item-to-latent factor relationship (metric invariance test) and mean of each scale item (scalar invariance test), on a large sample of 1,065 respondents recruited from Singapore (Asian sample) and the United States (Western sample). We found that two items assessing PA (“excited” and “proud”) and three items assessing NA (“guilty,” “hostile,” and “ashamed”) exhibited metric noninvariance whereas 11 of the remaining metric invariant items exhibited scalar noninvariance, suggesting that the PA and NA constructs differ from what the PANAS is expected to measure for Asian respondents. Our findings serve as a cautionary note to researchers who intend to administer the PANAS in future studies as well as to researchers interpreting the results of past studies involving respondents from Asian countries 2020-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3041 info:doi/10.1111/ajsp.12390 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4298/viewcontent/Examining_the_cross.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University cross-cultural comparison measurement invariance multigroup confirmatory factor analysis negative affect PANAS positive affect American Studies Asian Studies Clinical Psychology |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
cross-cultural comparison measurement invariance multigroup confirmatory factor analysis negative affect PANAS positive affect American Studies Asian Studies Clinical Psychology |
spellingShingle |
cross-cultural comparison measurement invariance multigroup confirmatory factor analysis negative affect PANAS positive affect American Studies Asian Studies Clinical Psychology LEE, Sean Teck Hao HARTANTO, Andree YONG, Jose C. KOH, Brandon LEUNG, Angela K. Y. Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample |
description |
The positive affect and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is a popular measure of positive (PA) and negative affectivity (NA). Developed and validated in Western contexts, the 20-item scale has been frequently administered on respondents from Asian countries with the assumption of cross-cultural measurement invariance. We examine this assumption via a rigorous multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, which allows us to assess between-group differences in both strength of scale item-to-latent factor relationship (metric invariance test) and mean of each scale item (scalar invariance test), on a large sample of 1,065 respondents recruited from Singapore (Asian sample) and the United States (Western sample). We found that two items assessing PA (“excited” and “proud”) and three items assessing NA (“guilty,” “hostile,” and “ashamed”) exhibited metric noninvariance whereas 11 of the remaining metric invariant items exhibited scalar noninvariance, suggesting that the PA and NA constructs differ from what the PANAS is expected to measure for Asian respondents. Our findings serve as a cautionary note to researchers who intend to administer the PANAS in future studies as well as to researchers interpreting the results of past studies involving respondents from Asian countries |
format |
text |
author |
LEE, Sean Teck Hao HARTANTO, Andree YONG, Jose C. KOH, Brandon LEUNG, Angela K. Y. |
author_facet |
LEE, Sean Teck Hao HARTANTO, Andree YONG, Jose C. KOH, Brandon LEUNG, Angela K. Y. |
author_sort |
LEE, Sean Teck Hao |
title |
Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample |
title_short |
Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample |
title_full |
Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample |
title_fullStr |
Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample |
title_full_unstemmed |
Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample |
title_sort |
examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an asian (singaporean) sample and a western (american) sample |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3041 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4298/viewcontent/Examining_the_cross.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574975498977280 |