Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample

The positive affect and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is a popular measure of positive (PA) and negative affectivity (NA). Developed and validated in Western contexts, the 20-item scale has been frequently administered on respondents from Asian countries with the assumption of cross-cultural meas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LEE, Sean Teck Hao, HARTANTO, Andree, YONG, Jose C., KOH, Brandon, LEUNG, Angela K. Y.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3041
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4298/viewcontent/Examining_the_cross.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4298
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-42982021-11-25T05:11:33Z Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample LEE, Sean Teck Hao HARTANTO, Andree YONG, Jose C. KOH, Brandon LEUNG, Angela K. Y. The positive affect and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is a popular measure of positive (PA) and negative affectivity (NA). Developed and validated in Western contexts, the 20-item scale has been frequently administered on respondents from Asian countries with the assumption of cross-cultural measurement invariance. We examine this assumption via a rigorous multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, which allows us to assess between-group differences in both strength of scale item-to-latent factor relationship (metric invariance test) and mean of each scale item (scalar invariance test), on a large sample of 1,065 respondents recruited from Singapore (Asian sample) and the United States (Western sample). We found that two items assessing PA (“excited” and “proud”) and three items assessing NA (“guilty,” “hostile,” and “ashamed”) exhibited metric noninvariance whereas 11 of the remaining metric invariant items exhibited scalar noninvariance, suggesting that the PA and NA constructs differ from what the PANAS is expected to measure for Asian respondents. Our findings serve as a cautionary note to researchers who intend to administer the PANAS in future studies as well as to researchers interpreting the results of past studies involving respondents from Asian countries 2020-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3041 info:doi/10.1111/ajsp.12390 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4298/viewcontent/Examining_the_cross.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University cross-cultural comparison measurement invariance multigroup confirmatory factor analysis negative affect PANAS positive affect American Studies Asian Studies Clinical Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic cross-cultural comparison
measurement invariance
multigroup confirmatory factor analysis
negative affect
PANAS
positive affect
American Studies
Asian Studies
Clinical Psychology
spellingShingle cross-cultural comparison
measurement invariance
multigroup confirmatory factor analysis
negative affect
PANAS
positive affect
American Studies
Asian Studies
Clinical Psychology
LEE, Sean Teck Hao
HARTANTO, Andree
YONG, Jose C.
KOH, Brandon
LEUNG, Angela K. Y.
Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample
description The positive affect and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is a popular measure of positive (PA) and negative affectivity (NA). Developed and validated in Western contexts, the 20-item scale has been frequently administered on respondents from Asian countries with the assumption of cross-cultural measurement invariance. We examine this assumption via a rigorous multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, which allows us to assess between-group differences in both strength of scale item-to-latent factor relationship (metric invariance test) and mean of each scale item (scalar invariance test), on a large sample of 1,065 respondents recruited from Singapore (Asian sample) and the United States (Western sample). We found that two items assessing PA (“excited” and “proud”) and three items assessing NA (“guilty,” “hostile,” and “ashamed”) exhibited metric noninvariance whereas 11 of the remaining metric invariant items exhibited scalar noninvariance, suggesting that the PA and NA constructs differ from what the PANAS is expected to measure for Asian respondents. Our findings serve as a cautionary note to researchers who intend to administer the PANAS in future studies as well as to researchers interpreting the results of past studies involving respondents from Asian countries
format text
author LEE, Sean Teck Hao
HARTANTO, Andree
YONG, Jose C.
KOH, Brandon
LEUNG, Angela K. Y.
author_facet LEE, Sean Teck Hao
HARTANTO, Andree
YONG, Jose C.
KOH, Brandon
LEUNG, Angela K. Y.
author_sort LEE, Sean Teck Hao
title Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample
title_short Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample
title_full Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample
title_fullStr Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample
title_full_unstemmed Examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample
title_sort examining the cross-cultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an asian (singaporean) sample and a western (american) sample
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3041
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4298/viewcontent/Examining_the_cross.pdf
_version_ 1770574975498977280