Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat

Andrew Forcehimes and Luke Semrau argue that agent-relative consequentialism is implausible because in some circumstances it classes an act as impermissible yet holds that the outcome of all agents performing that impermissible act is preferable. I argue that their problem is closely related to Dere...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HAMMERTON, Matthew
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3200
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4457/viewcontent/DCSD__Agent_Relative_Consequentialism.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4457
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-44572022-04-18T10:35:58Z Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat HAMMERTON, Matthew Andrew Forcehimes and Luke Semrau argue that agent-relative consequentialism is implausible because in some circumstances it classes an act as impermissible yet holds that the outcome of all agents performing that impermissible act is preferable. I argue that their problem is closely related to Derek Parfit's problem of ‘direct collective self-defeat’ and show how Parfit's plausible solution to his problem can be adapted to solve their problem. 2020-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3200 info:doi/10.1017/s0953820820000096 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4457/viewcontent/DCSD__Agent_Relative_Consequentialism.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University agent-relative consequentialism agent-relative value consequentializing direct collective self-defeat Ethics and Political Philosophy Personality and Social Contexts
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic agent-relative consequentialism
agent-relative value
consequentializing
direct collective self-defeat
Ethics and Political Philosophy
Personality and Social Contexts
spellingShingle agent-relative consequentialism
agent-relative value
consequentializing
direct collective self-defeat
Ethics and Political Philosophy
Personality and Social Contexts
HAMMERTON, Matthew
Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
description Andrew Forcehimes and Luke Semrau argue that agent-relative consequentialism is implausible because in some circumstances it classes an act as impermissible yet holds that the outcome of all agents performing that impermissible act is preferable. I argue that their problem is closely related to Derek Parfit's problem of ‘direct collective self-defeat’ and show how Parfit's plausible solution to his problem can be adapted to solve their problem.
format text
author HAMMERTON, Matthew
author_facet HAMMERTON, Matthew
author_sort HAMMERTON, Matthew
title Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
title_short Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
title_full Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
title_fullStr Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
title_full_unstemmed Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
title_sort agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3200
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4457/viewcontent/DCSD__Agent_Relative_Consequentialism.pdf
_version_ 1770575314433343488