Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
Andrew Forcehimes and Luke Semrau argue that agent-relative consequentialism is implausible because in some circumstances it classes an act as impermissible yet holds that the outcome of all agents performing that impermissible act is preferable. I argue that their problem is closely related to Dere...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3200 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4457/viewcontent/DCSD__Agent_Relative_Consequentialism.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4457 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-44572022-04-18T10:35:58Z Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat HAMMERTON, Matthew Andrew Forcehimes and Luke Semrau argue that agent-relative consequentialism is implausible because in some circumstances it classes an act as impermissible yet holds that the outcome of all agents performing that impermissible act is preferable. I argue that their problem is closely related to Derek Parfit's problem of ‘direct collective self-defeat’ and show how Parfit's plausible solution to his problem can be adapted to solve their problem. 2020-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3200 info:doi/10.1017/s0953820820000096 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4457/viewcontent/DCSD__Agent_Relative_Consequentialism.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University agent-relative consequentialism agent-relative value consequentializing direct collective self-defeat Ethics and Political Philosophy Personality and Social Contexts |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
agent-relative consequentialism agent-relative value consequentializing direct collective self-defeat Ethics and Political Philosophy Personality and Social Contexts |
spellingShingle |
agent-relative consequentialism agent-relative value consequentializing direct collective self-defeat Ethics and Political Philosophy Personality and Social Contexts HAMMERTON, Matthew Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat |
description |
Andrew Forcehimes and Luke Semrau argue that agent-relative consequentialism is implausible because in some circumstances it classes an act as impermissible yet holds that the outcome of all agents performing that impermissible act is preferable. I argue that their problem is closely related to Derek Parfit's problem of ‘direct collective self-defeat’ and show how Parfit's plausible solution to his problem can be adapted to solve their problem. |
format |
text |
author |
HAMMERTON, Matthew |
author_facet |
HAMMERTON, Matthew |
author_sort |
HAMMERTON, Matthew |
title |
Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat |
title_short |
Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat |
title_full |
Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat |
title_fullStr |
Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat |
title_sort |
agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3200 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4457/viewcontent/DCSD__Agent_Relative_Consequentialism.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575314433343488 |