Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
Past research has found that stewardship belief can motivate pro-environmentalism among religious individuals. The present study investigates the emotional pathways linking religious stewardship belief and pro-environmental policy support. In an online experiment conducted with Christians in the Uni...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3835 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5093/viewcontent/ReligiousStewardship_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5093 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-50932023-11-20T01:39:25Z Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger NG, Shu Tian EOM, Kimin Past research has found that stewardship belief can motivate pro-environmentalism among religious individuals. The present study investigates the emotional pathways linking religious stewardship belief and pro-environmental policy support. In an online experiment conducted with Christians in the United States (N = 604), we experimentally primed stewardship belief (N = 195) using a video that highlighted the human responsibility to care for God’s creations. We also included a control condition (N = 206) and a religion condition (N = 203), which presented a more generic religious message. As demonstrated in a mediation model, the stewardship manipulation (vs. control condition) increased feelings of guilt and anger toward environmental issues, which in turn increased support for pro-environmental policies (i.e., behavioral outcome of petition signing). Based on bootstrapped confidence intervals, the indirect effects of the stewardship prime on environmental policy support via guilt and anger were significant. In contrast, the religion condition had no significant effect on policy support. These findings contribute to explaining how religious people, tasked with the duty of stewardship, may be emotionally driven to engage with environmental issues. 2023-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3835 info:doi/10.1037/rel0000499 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5093/viewcontent/ReligiousStewardship_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University emotion environmental policy pro-environmentalism religiosity stewardship belief Applied Behavior Analysis Place and Environment Social Psychology |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
emotion environmental policy pro-environmentalism religiosity stewardship belief Applied Behavior Analysis Place and Environment Social Psychology |
spellingShingle |
emotion environmental policy pro-environmentalism religiosity stewardship belief Applied Behavior Analysis Place and Environment Social Psychology NG, Shu Tian EOM, Kimin Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger |
description |
Past research has found that stewardship belief can motivate pro-environmentalism among religious individuals. The present study investigates the emotional pathways linking religious stewardship belief and pro-environmental policy support. In an online experiment conducted with Christians in the United States (N = 604), we experimentally primed stewardship belief (N = 195) using a video that highlighted the human responsibility to care for God’s creations. We also included a control condition (N = 206) and a religion condition (N = 203), which presented a more generic religious message. As demonstrated in a mediation model, the stewardship manipulation (vs. control condition) increased feelings of guilt and anger toward environmental issues, which in turn increased support for pro-environmental policies (i.e., behavioral outcome of petition signing). Based on bootstrapped confidence intervals, the indirect effects of the stewardship prime on environmental policy support via guilt and anger were significant. In contrast, the religion condition had no significant effect on policy support. These findings contribute to explaining how religious people, tasked with the duty of stewardship, may be emotionally driven to engage with environmental issues. |
format |
text |
author |
NG, Shu Tian EOM, Kimin |
author_facet |
NG, Shu Tian EOM, Kimin |
author_sort |
NG, Shu Tian |
title |
Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger |
title_short |
Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger |
title_full |
Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger |
title_fullStr |
Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger |
title_sort |
religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: the mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3835 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5093/viewcontent/ReligiousStewardship_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1783955694387462144 |