Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger

Past research has found that stewardship belief can motivate pro-environmentalism among religious individuals. The present study investigates the emotional pathways linking religious stewardship belief and pro-environmental policy support. In an online experiment conducted with Christians in the Uni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: NG, Shu Tian, EOM, Kimin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3835
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5093/viewcontent/ReligiousStewardship_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5093
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-50932023-11-20T01:39:25Z Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger NG, Shu Tian EOM, Kimin Past research has found that stewardship belief can motivate pro-environmentalism among religious individuals. The present study investigates the emotional pathways linking religious stewardship belief and pro-environmental policy support. In an online experiment conducted with Christians in the United States (N = 604), we experimentally primed stewardship belief (N = 195) using a video that highlighted the human responsibility to care for God’s creations. We also included a control condition (N = 206) and a religion condition (N = 203), which presented a more generic religious message. As demonstrated in a mediation model, the stewardship manipulation (vs. control condition) increased feelings of guilt and anger toward environmental issues, which in turn increased support for pro-environmental policies (i.e., behavioral outcome of petition signing). Based on bootstrapped confidence intervals, the indirect effects of the stewardship prime on environmental policy support via guilt and anger were significant. In contrast, the religion condition had no significant effect on policy support. These findings contribute to explaining how religious people, tasked with the duty of stewardship, may be emotionally driven to engage with environmental issues. 2023-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3835 info:doi/10.1037/rel0000499 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5093/viewcontent/ReligiousStewardship_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University emotion environmental policy pro-environmentalism religiosity stewardship belief Applied Behavior Analysis Place and Environment Social Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic emotion
environmental policy
pro-environmentalism
religiosity
stewardship belief
Applied Behavior Analysis
Place and Environment
Social Psychology
spellingShingle emotion
environmental policy
pro-environmentalism
religiosity
stewardship belief
Applied Behavior Analysis
Place and Environment
Social Psychology
NG, Shu Tian
EOM, Kimin
Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
description Past research has found that stewardship belief can motivate pro-environmentalism among religious individuals. The present study investigates the emotional pathways linking religious stewardship belief and pro-environmental policy support. In an online experiment conducted with Christians in the United States (N = 604), we experimentally primed stewardship belief (N = 195) using a video that highlighted the human responsibility to care for God’s creations. We also included a control condition (N = 206) and a religion condition (N = 203), which presented a more generic religious message. As demonstrated in a mediation model, the stewardship manipulation (vs. control condition) increased feelings of guilt and anger toward environmental issues, which in turn increased support for pro-environmental policies (i.e., behavioral outcome of petition signing). Based on bootstrapped confidence intervals, the indirect effects of the stewardship prime on environmental policy support via guilt and anger were significant. In contrast, the religion condition had no significant effect on policy support. These findings contribute to explaining how religious people, tasked with the duty of stewardship, may be emotionally driven to engage with environmental issues.
format text
author NG, Shu Tian
EOM, Kimin
author_facet NG, Shu Tian
EOM, Kimin
author_sort NG, Shu Tian
title Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
title_short Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
title_full Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
title_fullStr Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
title_full_unstemmed Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
title_sort religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: the mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3835
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5093/viewcontent/ReligiousStewardship_av.pdf
_version_ 1783955694387462144