Coder reliability and misclassification in the human coding of party manifestos
The Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP) provides the only time series of estimated party policy positions in political science and has been extensively used in a wide variety of applications. Recent work (e.g., Benoit, Laver, and Mikhaylov 2009; Klingemann et al. 2006) focuses on nonsystematic sourc...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | MIKHAYLOV, Slava, LAVER, Michael, BENOIT, Kenneth |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3983 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5241/viewcontent/coder_reliability_and_misclassification_pvoa_cc_by.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
How to scale coded text units without bias: A response to Gemenis
by: BENOIT, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts
by: LOWE, Will, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Natural sentences as valid units for coded political texts
by: DAUBLER, Thomas, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Treating words as data with error: Uncertainty in text statements of policy positions
by: BENOIT, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis
by: BENOIT, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2007)