(In)Visible China: Understanding Chinese global orders
Where is China going? What does its alternative global order look like? We hear a lot about China’s grand projects like the Belt and Road Initiative, but how are they experienced on the ground in Africa, South America, and Asia?The Chinese Global Orders project brings together twenty-two scholars fr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4135 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5394/viewcontent/InVisibleChina.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | Where is China going? What does its alternative global order look like? We hear a lot about China’s grand projects like the Belt and Road Initiative, but how are they experienced on the ground in Africa, South America, and Asia?The Chinese Global Orders project brings together twenty-two scholars from five continents to explore these questions. As these four commentaries show, it seeks to pluralize the discussion by exploring “Chinese” beyond the PRC nation-state, “Global” as a space beyond the international, and “Orders” as a plural set of norms.The project seeks to do more than just describe Global China’s material impact, and it does this by employing a new set of concepts to theorize Chinese interactions in local, national, regional, and global spaces.Over the next four weeks, this set of essays will mobilize the concepts of (in)visibility (Karrar), hypervisibility (Callahan), (il)legibility (Morris), and then (in)visibility again with a twist (Whiteman) to provoke new understandings of China’s engagement with the world.This section starts with Hasan H. Karrar’s “(In)visible China?,” which problematizes top-down and state-centric views of “Global China” by examining how Chinese global orders appear in Pakistan through the paradoxical interplay of visibility and invisibility—what Karrar calls (in)visibility. In other words, while China is very visible in elite national discourse, Chinese companies’ substantial investments and interventions are largely invisible in discussions of local society and politics in Pakistan. |
|---|