Ejection Fraction from MUGA: Comparisons between Xeleris and Pegasys Workstations

Background: MUGA scans have been well utilized to evaluate left ventricular function, popularly as a non-invasive tool for quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values. Therefore, it is often requested to periodically evaluate left ventricular function in oncologic patients who...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sasithorn Amnuaywattakorn, Sasivimol Promma, Suchawadee Musikarat, Tanawat Tawonwong, ศศิธร อำนวยวัตถากร, ศศิวิมล พรหมมา, สุชาวดี มุสิกรัตน์, ชยันตร์ธร ปทุมานนท์
Other Authors: Mahidol University. Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital. Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology
Format: Original Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/79583
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Background: MUGA scans have been well utilized to evaluate left ventricular function, popularly as a non-invasive tool for quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values. Therefore, it is often requested to periodically evaluate left ventricular function in oncologic patients who are required for cardiotoxic-prone chemotherapy such as Doxorubicin based regimen. Withholding or cessation of the prescribed chemotherapy would be necessary if LVEFs were significantly declined Objective: To correlate individual LVEF values calculating between two different manufacturing workstations. Methods: One-hundred MUGA raw data from oncologic female patients were included. All data were loaded in two different manufacturing workstations, namely Pegasys and Xeleris. LVEF values were subsequently calculated using semi-automated method of gated analysis software in each workstation. The 2 sets of LVEF values were correlated. Results: The agreement between the two workstations was high (r2= 0.93). The differences in LVEF values between two workstations were acceptable (within ± 5%). Conclusions: Our result indicated similarity of LVEF values between two different manufacturing workstations. Therefore, these workstations may be used interchangeably in certain situations.